Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks?
Learning in Projects, Remembering in Networks?
复制标题
在项目中学习，在网络中记忆？
DOI：
10.1177/0969776404041417
复制
发表时间：
2004
影响因子：
3.1
通讯作者：
Gernot Grabher
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gernot Grabher
本文旨在对比基于项目的学习的两个相反的逻辑。知识的积累和模块化是学习逻辑的关键要求，慕尼黑的软件生态学就是一个例子。学习的目的是从“一次性”转向可重复的解决方案。这种累积的逻辑与由原创性和创造性的格言驱动的不连续学习制度并列。“通过转换学习”在这里意味着伦敦广告生态所体现的象征性知识实践。本文探讨了这些学习模式，随后探索学习和遗忘的过程中，核心团队，公司和认知社区绑在一起完成一个特定的项目。此外，该文件还将注意力集中到更分散的学习过程中的意识空间，延伸到实际的生产关系之外和之下。而不是沿着沿着一个简单的网络密度和知识类型的标量嵌套映射的意识空间（减少到臭名昭著的全球与本地二分法），本文提出了一个区分，主要涉及不同的社会和沟通逻辑。社区性意味着持久而紧密的联系，社会性意味着紧密而短暂的关系，连通性意味着短暂而脆弱的网络。
This paper seeks to contrast two opposing logics of project-based learning. Accumulation and modularization of knowledge denote the key imperatives of a learning logic that is exemplified by the software ecology in Munich. Learning is geared towards moving from ‘one-off’ to repeatable solutions. This cumulative logic is juxtaposed with a discontinuous learning regime that is driven by the maxims of originality and creativity. ‘Learning by switching’ here signifies the emblematic knowledge practice that is exemplified by the London advertising ecology. The paper explores these learning modes by subsequently exploring processes of learning and forgetting within and between the core team, the firm, and the epistemic community tied together for the completion of a specific project. In addition, the paper also directs attention to more diffuse learning processes in an awareness space that extends beyond and beneath the actual production ties. Instead of mapping the awareness space along a simplistic scalar nesting of network density and knowledge types (reduced to the notorious global vs local dichotomy), the paper proposes a differentiation that primarily involves different social and communicative logics. Whereas communality signifies lasting and intense ties, sociality signifies intense and yet ephemeral relations and connectivity indicates transient and weak networks.