Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C 3 versus C 4 grass response to elevated CO 2 during a 20-year field experiment”
Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C 3 versus C 4 grass response to elevated CO 2 during a 20-year field experiment”
复制标题
对“20 年田间实验期间 C 3 与 C 4 草对 CO 2 升高的反应出现意外逆转”的评论的回应
DOI：
10.1126/science.aau8982
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
56.9
通讯作者：
Pastore, Melissa A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Reich, Peter B.;Hobbie, Sarah E.;Lee, Tali D.;Pastore, Melissa A.
Wolf和Ziska认为，土壤和物种属性可以解释c3 - c4草对二氧化碳升高的反应在20年里出人意料的逆转。这与我们最初的解释是一致的；然而，我们不同意这样的说法，即这些解释在某种程度上使我们的结果与质疑植物基于光合途径中c3 - c4差异对二氧化碳反应的长期范式无关。
Wolf and Ziska suggest that soil and species attributes can explain an unexpected 20-year reversal of C3-C4grass responses to elevated CO2. This is consistent with our original interpretation; however, we disagree with the assertion that such explanations somehow render our results irrelevant for questioning a long-standing paradigm of plant response to CO2based on C3-C4differences in photosynthetic pathway.