Geospatial Privacy and Security
Geospatial Privacy and Security
复制标题
地理空间隐私和安全
DOI:
10.5311/josis.2019.19.608
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Clio Andris
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Grant McKenzie;C. Kessler;Clio Andris
Location privacy has been a topic of research for many years but has recently experienced a resurgence in public interest. This renewed interest is driven by recent advances in location-enabled devices, sensors and context-aware technology, and the rise of the Internet of Things (IoT). The data generated via these sensors and devices is being collected, analyzed, and synthesized at an unprecedented rate. While much of this data is used in the advancement of products or services (e.g., navigation technologies), many individuals remain unaware of the information that is being collected, how it is being collected, and more importantly, how it is being used. The resulting information extracted from this personal data has contributed to significant advances in the computational and geospatial sciences, e.g., location recommendations or health services. However, these advances often come at the high cost of reduced location privacy. From an academic perspective, geospatial privacy and security are crucial topics with roots in computer science, geography, sociology, and psychology, demonstrated by a long history of location privacy discussion in both industry and academia (c.f. [2, 3, 10, 1, 9]). While it is often discussed at a theoretical level, it has major societal implications that reach beyond these disciplines and into everyday life. To give a timely example, the U.S. government, acknowledging the potential for abuse, is limiting access to the data for the upcoming 2020 Census, choosing to protect citizen information via differential privacy [4] in order to impede the fusing of this data with other datasets for the purpose of identifying individuals [11]. In today’s digital world, the “right to be forgotten” is becoming increasingly difficult to exercise. It is almost impossible to remove an individual’s digital footprint from the public sphere. In a recent editorial in the New York Times, the CEO of the location data and intelligence company Foursquare called on the U.S. Congress to regulate the location industry [7]. The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe is a good first step, but the road is long. Citizens are beginning to take back ownership of their private information, asking corporations what they know about them, and requesting access to and removal of such data. There are regional variations in privacy regulations though, and the cost of violating an individual’s digital privacy varies substantially. The plethora of services accessing your personal and location information is often hard to keep track of, meaning we often do not realize when our privacy has been violated. Many aspects of location privacy are inherently unique in character, and spatial data scientists are well-versed to lead this discussion. While a typical conversation on the topic of privacy inevitably turns to the protection of credit cards, bank accounts, or social security numbers, protecting one’s location data is arguably more important. For instance, we share other’s personal locations, innocuously, without them knowing. Current technologies and tools exist that are so new that we still do not really know what to do with them