Intimate Partner Violence and Associated Risk Factors Among Youth in the Slums of Kampala
Intimate Partner Violence and Associated Risk Factors Among Youth in the Slums of Kampala
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0886260519889927
复制
发表时间：
2019-11-29
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Musuya, Tina
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Culbreth, Rachel;Swahn, Monica H.;Musuya, Tina
本研究的目的是检查与亲密伴侣暴力（IPV）在坎帕拉贫民窟生活的青年中的相关因素。该分析基于2014年春季对居住在坎帕拉贫民窟的青年进行的横断面研究（N = 1134）。参与者（12-18岁）参加了乌干达青年发展联系中心，该中心为生活在坎帕拉街头和贫民窟的青年提供服务。进行了双变量和多变量多项分析，以检查与仅IPV受害、仅IPV犯罪以及同时IPV受害和犯罪与无IPV受害或犯罪相关的风险因素。在报告有男朋友或女朋友的青少年中（n = 600）， 18.3% （n = 110）报告遭受过IPV侵害和犯罪，11.0% （n = 66）报告只遭受过IPV侵害，7.7% （n = 46）报告只遭受过IPV侵害，63.0% （n = 378）报告没有IPV经历。在多变量分析中，IPV受害仅与目睹父母IPV（比值比[OR] = 2.78； 95%可信区间[CI] =[1.42, 5.48]）、经历父母身体虐待（OR = 2.27; 95% CI =[1.16, 4.46]）和社区凝聚力（OR = 0.73; 95% CI =[0.31, 1.69]）相关。IPV犯罪仅与遭受父母身体虐待相关（OR = 2.86; 95% CI =[1.62, 5.07]）。报告IPV受害和施暴者与无问题饮酒（OR = 2.03; 95% CI =[1.15, 3.57]）、酗酒问题（OR = 2.65; 95% CI =[1.48, 4.74]）、目睹父母IPV （OR = 2.94; 95% CI =[1.80, 4.80]）、经历父母身体虐待（OR = 2.23; 95% CI =[1.38, 3.60]）和无家可归（OR = 1.90; 95% CI =[1.14, 3.16]）相关。在这一人群中，IPV受害和实施的程度非常高，需要紧急关注。
The purpose of this study is to examine the factors associated with intimate partner violence (IPV) among youth living in the slums of Kampala. This analysis is based on a cross-sectional study of youth living in the slums of Kampala conducted in spring 2014 (N = 1,134). The participants (12-18 years of age) were attending Uganda Youth Development Link centers, which serve youth living on the streets and slums of Kampala. Bivariate and multivariable multinomial analyses were conducted to examine risk factors associated with IPV victimization only, IPV perpetration only, and both IPV victimization and perpetration compared with no IPV victimization or perpetration. Among youth who reported having a boyfriend or girlfriend (n = 600), 18.3% (n = 110) reported experiencing both IPV victimization and perpetration, 11.0% (n = 66) reported IPV perpetration only, 7.7% (n = 46) reported experiencing IPV victimization only, and 63.0% (n = 378) reported no IPV experiences. In the multivariable analysis, IPV victimization only was associated with witnessing parental IPV (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.42, 5.48]), experiencing parental physical abuse (OR = 2.27; 95% CI = [1.16, 4.46]), and neighborhood cohesiveness (OR = 0.73; 95% CI = [0.31, 1.69]). IPV perpetration was only associated with experiencing parental physical abuse (OR = 2.86; 95% CI = [1.62, 5.07]). Reporting both IPV victimization and perpetration was associated with non-problem drinking (OR = 2.03; 95% CI = [1.15, 3.57]), problem drinking (OR = 2.65; 95% CI = [1.48, 4.74]), witnessing parental IPV (OR = 2.94; 95% CI = [1.80, 4.80]), experiencing parental physical abuse (OR = 2.23; 95% CI = [1.38, 3.60]), and homelessness (OR = 1.90; 95% CI = [1.14, 3.16]). Levels of IPV victimization and perpetration are very high in this population and warrant urgent attention.