Jefferson
Jefferson
复制标题
杰斐逊
DOI：
10.4159/harvard.9780674864344.c38
复制
发表时间：
1926
影响因子：
6.8
通讯作者：
Dumas Malone
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dumas Malone
关于精神病学团体训练的文献表明，大多数住院医师项目包括教学指导，但不提供有监督的团体治疗经验或要求有推荐团体治疗的能力。毫不奇怪，研究表明，FTW居民利用团体治疗-我-无论是领导一个小组或作出转介到小组-s-毕业后。本文回顾了当前的“愿景”小组训练，并提出了一种替代愿景。描述了这一新愿景的假设、组织形式和能力。强调的是适当转诊到团体的技能和能力的发展，这可能会对住院医师的态度和实践产生积极的影响。ACGME要求团体心理治疗的培训用于精神病学的认证项目（I）。然而，培训的数量、类型和质量是非常不稳定的，其结果也不尽人意（2-4）。在这种变化的背后，是当前团体培训的主导“愿景”。本文描述了这种观点的共同点及其对培训期间和培训后的患者的影响，并提出了一种团体心理治疗培训的替代观点，它可以更积极地影响和影响住院患者的态度和实践模式。
The literature on group training in psychiatry reveals that most residency programs include didactic seminarsbutftw qffersupervised group therapy experience orrequire competence in referral .forgroup therapy . Not surprisingly, research shows thatftw residents utilizegroup therapy-i-either leading a group or making referrals to groups-s-ofter graduation. This paper reviews the current "vision" qfgroup training and qffers an alternate vision. The assumptions, group.formats and competencies of this new vision are described. Emphasized are the deoelopment of skills and competencyqfmaking appropriatereferrals togroups, which may'positively impact resident attitudes and practicepatterns regardinggroup therapy . Training in group psychotherapy is required by the ACGME for accrediting programs in psychiatry (I) . However, th e amount, type, and qu ality of training is extraordina rily variable, and th e outcom es leave mu ch to be desired (2-4). Underl y ing this variability is the current dominant "vision" of group tra ining. This paper describes th e commo n ele me nts of thi s vision and its impact on res idents during and after training, and th en proposes an alte rnative vision for group psychotherapy training th at could more positively influ ence and impact residen t att itudes and practi ce patterns.