A Guide to Estimating the Reference Range From a Meta-Analysis Using Aggregate or Individual Participant Data.
A Guide to Estimating the Reference Range From a Meta-Analysis Using Aggregate or Individual Participant Data.
复制标题
使用聚合或个体参与者数据进行荟萃分析估计参考范围的指南。
DOI:
10.1093/aje/kwac013
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
5
通讯作者:
Chu,Haitao
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Siegel,Lianne;Murad,MHassan;Riley,RichardD;Bazerbachi,Fateh;Wang,Zhen;Chu,Haitao
Clinicians frequently must decide whether a patient’s measurement reflects that of a healthy “normal” individual. Thus, the reference range is defined as the interval in which some proportion (frequently 95%) of measurements from a healthy population is expected to fall. One can estimate it from a single study or preferably from a meta-analysis of multiple studies to increase generalizability. This range differs from the confidence interval for the pooled mean and the prediction interval for a new study mean in a meta-analysis, which do not capture natural variation across healthy individuals. Methods for estimating the reference range from a meta-analysis of aggregate data that incorporates both within- and between-study variations were recently proposed. In this guide, we present 3 approaches for estimating the reference range: one frequentist, one Bayesian, and one empirical. Each method can be applied to either aggregate or individual-participant data meta-analysis, with the latter being the gold standard when available. We illustrate the application of these approaches to data from a previously published individual-participant data meta-analysis of studies measuring liver stiffness by transient elastography in healthy individuals between 2006 and 2016.