Strength of different meniscus suturing techniques.
Strength of different meniscus suturing techniques.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s001670050031
复制
发表时间：
1997-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Goksan, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Asik, M;Sener, N;Goksan, A
我们测量并比较了五种不同的半月板缝合技术的主要稳定性。测试的技术有水平床垫，垂直床垫，结端，垂直和垂直循环。20只牛内侧半月板被切开以模拟周围纵向撕裂，并使用五种缝合技术中的一种进行修复。然后用Instron张力计拉半月板的两个部分，直到失效。与其他技术相比，结端技术的结果较差（平均极限破坏强度64 +/- 5 N）。垂直床垫在130 +/- 3 N时失效，垂直环在128 +/- 4.5 N时失效，水平床垫在98 +/- 5 N时失效，垂直缝合在136 +/- 2.7 N时失效。
We measured and compared the primary stabilities of five different meniscal suturing techniques. The techniques tested were horizontal mattress, vertical mattress, knot-end, vertical, and vertical loop. Twenty bovine medial menisci were cut to simulate peripheral longitudinal tears and repaired with one of the five suture techniques. Then the two parts of the meniscus were pulled using the Instron Tensometer until failure occurred. Knot-end techniques gave inferior results (mean ultimate failure strength 64 +/- 5 N) compared with the other techniques. Vertical mattress failed at 130 +/- 3 N, vertical loop at 128 +/- 4.5 N, horizontal mattress at 98 +/- 5 N and vertical suturing at 136 +/- 2.7 N. This study shows the superior mechanical characteristic of the vertical suturing technique.