Prevention science and positive youth development: Competitive or cooperative frameworks?

Prevention science and positive youth development: Competitive or cooperative frameworks?
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00496-2
复制
发表时间:
2002-12-01
影响因子:
7.6
通讯作者:
Arthur, MW
Arthur, MW
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Catalano, RF;Hawkins, JD;Arthur, MW

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:为了研究趋同的批评和建议,为未来的方案,以促进健康发展和预防问题行为的儿童和proficientsMethods:回顾文献捕捉两个思路,那些促进积极的青年发展的方法,以青年规划和那些促进预防科学的方法,以青年规划。结果表明,积极的青年发展和预防科学的倡导者有类似的批评单一的问题为重点的预防计划在20世纪80年代和90年代初,并为青年规划的未来有类似的建议。此外,审查青年发展的数据表明,重要的是要把重点放在风险和保护,防止青少年的问题,以及在促进积极的青年development.Conclusions:这些结果表明,青年发展和预防科学的方法已经从类似的根源,并提出类似的建议,为未来的青年规划。此外,关于前体的数据表明,注重促进保护和减少风险有可能预防问题,促进青年的积极发展。然而,这些方法的倡导者往往意见不一,认为这些方法为青年方案拟订提供了不同的范例方法。我们的结论是,这两种办法之间的合作将在青年方案拟订领域取得进一步进展。青少年医学协会,2002年。
Purpose: To examine the convergence in the critiques and recommendations for the future of programs to promote healthy development and prevent problem behaviors among children and adolescentsMethods: A review of literature captures two streams of thought, those promoting positive youth development approaches to youth programming and those promoting prevention science approaches to youth programming.Results: Results suggest that advocates of positive youth development and prevention science have similar critiques of single-problem-focused prevention programs in the 1980s and early 1990s, and have similar recommendations for the future of youth programming. Further, review of data on youth development suggests that it is important to focus on risk and protection in preventing adolescent problems as well as in promoting positive youth development.Conclusions: These results suggest that both youth development and prevention science approaches have grown from similar roots and make similar recommendations for the future of youth programming. Further, data on precursors suggest that focusing on promoting protection and reducing risk is likely to prevent problems and promote positive youth development. Yet advocates of these approaches often are at odds, suggesting that the approaches provide different paradigmatic approaches to youth programming. We conclude that cooperation between these two approaches would further progress in the field of youth programming. Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2002.