Is social learning always locally adaptive?
Is social learning always locally adaptive?
复制标题
社会学习总是本地适应性的吗?
作者:
K. Laland
Galef (1995) convincingly argued that socially learned behaviour patterns are typically adaptive, and demonstrated that the weight of empirical evidence supports this position. Unfortunately this otherwise commendable article contains several inaccurate statements that might lead readers to mistaken conclusions about social learning theory. Galef’s article is a response to mathematical models of the social transmission of behaviour in animals, which he criticized for reaching ‘the counterintuitive (and counterfactual) conclusion that traditional behaviour patterns are often not locally adaptive’ (page 1325). Galef argued that such models reach this erroneous position by treating socially acquired traits as ‘not affected by rewards or punishments contingent upon their expression’ (page 1325). In contrast, I argue that (1) many cultural evolution models explicitly incorporate the modifying effects of individual experience on socially learned behaviour, (2) cultural evolution models applied to animals do not conclude that social learning is often maladaptive, and (3) the findings of these models imply nothing about the relative longevity of individually and socially acquired information. None the less, I maintain that whether animal social learning is always adaptive is an open question, best resolved through empirical study. Galef’s critique focused primarily on two cultural evolution models (Boyd & Richerson 1988; Rogers 1988), which he argues assume that the frequency of expression of socially learned behaviour patterns is not affected by individual experience. This is a valid criticism of Rogers’ model, but not of Boyd & Richerson’s work, nor of other relevant theoretical studies that Galef ignores (Cavalli-Sforza & Feldman 1981; Vickery et al. 1991; Giraldeau et al. 1994). Galef inappropriately turned criticism of Rogers’ paper into a deficiency of the field. In an earlier analysis, Boyd & Richerson (1985, pp. 81–131) presented a model of ‘guided variation’ in which socially learned behaviour is explicitly modified on the basis of personal experience. This combination of learning and social transmission increases the frequency of those traits favoured by learning, and Boyd & Richerson emphasized that this force is a source of adaptive behaviour. In an animal population, such a trait might be the amount of a particular diet consumed, or the proportion of time spent foraging at a particular location. Galef (page 1326) distinguished Boyd & Richerson’s (1985) ‘guided variation’ model, which he favoured, from their 1988 model which he criticized. In fact, the models are conceptually similar, both being guided variation models, and their differences are of no relevance here. Boyd & Richerson (1988) assumed that ‘individuals in the population acquire their behavior by some mixture of social learning and individual learning’ (page 32). Specifically, they assumed that animals rely on social cues only when individual experience fails to provide guidance as to which behavioural variant is most likely to be successful (i.e. adaptive). Galef quoted their statement, ‘once an individual has acquired [a behaviour] it does not change’ (page 33), to imply that socially learned variants are immutable to individual experience. This interpretation is mistaken. To address evolutionary questions, it is common practice for mathematical models to condense a lifetime’s experience into a series of discrete stages. Boyd & Richerson (1988) assumed a simplified life cycle of (1) individual experience, which if inconclusive Correspondence: K. N. Laland, Sub-department of Animal Behaviour, University of Cambridge, Madingley, Cambridge CB3 8AA, U.K. (email: knl1001@hermes.cam.ac.uk).