A Study on the Definition Changing of Industrial Heritage
A Study on the Definition Changing of Industrial Heritage
复制标题
工业遗产定义变迁研究
DOI：
10.7738/jah.2012.21.1.065
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jong
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jae;Jong
本文对近来经常被提及的工业遗产概念的定义进行了研究，并考察了该术语的起源和变化过程，旨在澄清和提高其内涵和理解。特别是，在没有发生过产业革命等革新事件的韩国，从根本上了解产业遗产的意义和差异的基础研究。综观工业考古与工业遗产术语的起源与变迁过程，由于代际、现象性和术语性的原因，工业考古与工业遗产术语的概念呈现出模糊的定义。但可以察觉到他们的实验对象和计时范围都扩大了。亚洲国家韩国、中国和日本在接受这些条款时也经历了主要是现象上和术语上的混乱。韩国工业遗产可以从尼兹尼塔吉尔宪章中对工业遗产的定义进行界定。但是，必须重新定义工业化时期。该研究提出了韩国现代产业化的4个阶段，并主张不仅要保护殖民时期的产业遗产，还要保护1960 ~ 80年代的产业遗产。
This is a study concerning about the definition of the concept of industrial heritage being mentioned often lately, and considering the term`s origin and changing process aiming at clarifying and improving its undertone and understanding. Especially, it`s a basic study to make people understand fundamentally what industrial heritage means and differences in Korea in where any innovative affair such as industrial revolution has never occurred. Looking into the origin and changing process of the industrial archaeology & industrial heritage terms, their concepts appear ambiguously defined due to their generational, phenomenal and terminological reason. but it`s detectable that their subjects and timing range have been extended. Korea, China and Japan, the Asian nations also have gone through mainly phenomenal and terminological mess in accepting the terms. Korean industrial heritage can define from the definition of industrial heritage in Nyzni Tagil charter. It, however, have to redefine about period of industrialization. This study suggest the 4 steps of modern industrialization in Korea and insist that we have to conserve industrial heritages not only in colonial period but also in 1960-80 industrialization in korea.