Methodology-21: what do we do in the afterward?
Methodology-21: what do we do in the afterward?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/09518398.2013.788753
复制
发表时间：
2013-01-01
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Lather, Patti
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lather, Patti
本文提出了“在什么之后”的问题，并将定性研究置于当下各种“死亡”和“回归”之中。本书将重点放在充实后定性研究上，首先概述了作为新自由主义治理的一部分，通过标准和规则对定性研究进行规范的努力，然后通过四个例子阐述了后定性可能意味着什么。第一个来自瑞典，关注女性主义课堂中的关系纠缠数据分析；接下来的两个例子是来自澳大利亚的关于西方和土著知识体系交集的合作研究；最后一个例子来自埃及，这是一个女权主义者对妇女清真寺运动的后殖民研究。文章最后呼吁“向前想象”，摆脱对狭隘科学的困扰，制定新自由主义的“后”。
This paper asks "after what" and situates qualitative research in the present moment in the midst of various "deaths" and "returns." With a focus on fleshing out post-qualitative research, it first sketches efforts to discipline qualitative research via standards and rubrics as a part of neoliberal govenmentality and then elaborates what post-qualitative might mean via four exemplars. The first is from Sweden, a focus on relational entangled data analysis in the feminist classroom; the next two exemplars are collaborative studies from Australia at the intersection of Western and Aboriginal knowledge systems; the final exemplar is from Egypt, a feminist post-colonial study of the women's mosque movement. The paper concludes with a call to "imagine forward" out of troubling a narrow scientificity and enacting an "after" of neoliberalism.