Commentary on the special issue on disproportionate exposure to trauma: Disrupting single stories, broadening the aperture, and embracing the trauma socioexposome in research with minoritized individuals.

Commentary on the special issue on disproportionate exposure to trauma: Disrupting single stories, broadening the aperture, and embracing the trauma socioexposome in research with minoritized individuals.
复制标题

关于过度暴露于创伤的特刊的评论:破坏单一故事,扩大孔径,并在少数群体的研究中拥抱创伤社会暴露。

DOI:
10.1002/jts.22747
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
Powell,Wizdom
Powell,Wizdom
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Powell,Wizdom

文献摘要

相似文献

在创伤压力杂志的这一特刊中,理论驱动的研究阐明了当学者考虑独特的社会生态背景和少数群体个体的暴露历史时,创伤压力研究中出现的机会和固有的方法复杂性。此外,纳入的文章挑战了该领域的范式与适应不良的个人创伤反应的关注,并邀请研究人员将注意力转移到一系列环境逆境所发挥的作用。这篇评论围绕三个关键建议进行组织,这些建议涉及加强未来创伤暴露的少数群体研究和治疗所需的内容:(a)破坏关于创伤风险,检测,保护和复原力的单一科学故事;(B)接受创伤社会群体的复杂性;(c)扩大评估,研究和减轻综合风险的能力。本评注介绍了这期特刊的文章如何突出和强调这些要点,并得出结论认为,学者和临床医生需要的镜头和方法,可以帮助评估和治疗整个人和社区从生物心理社会的角度时,种族主义贡献了一个复杂的创伤社会心理学,而不是永久的科学和临床模型的基础上,只有单一的孤立的个体面对离散的创伤事件的故事。
The theory‐driven studies in this special issue of theJournal of Traumatic Stressillustrate the opportunities and inherent methodological complexities that arise in traumatic stress studies when scholars consider the unique social–ecological contexts and exposure histories of minoritized individuals. Moreover, the included articles challenge the field's paradigmatic preoccupation with maladaptive individual trauma responses and invite researchers to shift their attention to the role played by a range of environmental adversities. This commentary is organized around three key recommendations regarding what is needed to enhance future research and treatment among trauma‐exposed minoritized populations: (a) disrupt single scientific stories about trauma risk, detection, protection, and resilience; (b) embrace the complexity of the trauma socioexposome; and (c) expand capacity to assess, research, and mitigate syndemic risk. The present commentary describes how these key points are highlighted and underscored in the articles in this special issue, arriving at the conclusion that, more than ever, scholars and clinicians need lenses and methods that can help in assessing and treating the whole person and community from a biopsychosocial perspective when racism contibutes to a complex trauma socioexposome rather than perpetuating scientific and clinical models based only on single stories of isolated individuals confronted by discrete traumatic events.