Nonmotoric translation processes in the preparation of discrete finger responses: A rebuttal of Miller's (1985) analysis.
Nonmotoric translation processes in the preparation of discrete finger responses: A rebuttal of Miller's (1985) analysis.
复制标题
准备离散手指反应的非运动翻译过程：对 Miller (1985) 分析的反驳。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1985
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Proctor
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. G. Reeve;R. Proctor
米勒（Miller，1982）发现了同手在预处理离散手指反应方面的优势，并假设这种优势是运动反应准备效应。在一系列实验中，里夫和普罗克特（1984）研究了米勒使用的预处理程序，并得出结论，同手优势是由于非运动性决策（刺激-反应转换）过程。米勒（1985）质疑我们的结论，理由是我们的程序引入了新的反应集，翻译解释不能解释他的全部结果。这些论点在本观察评估，并发现没有得到有力的支持。米勒还提出了一个reinterpretati对我们的结果，属性的优势，空间编码的反应。虽然他的编码解释与我们之前提出的解释非常相似，但他的解释将编码操作归因于响应准备过程，而我们的解释将这些操作归因于决策过程。米勒报告了一项新的预处理实验，他将其解释为对他的反应准备帐户的支持。然而，我们从反应准备和翻译账户中得出了不同的预测，发现米勒的数据与我们的翻译账户更一致。因此，我们的结论仍然是，同手优势归因于非运动过程。
Miller (1982) found a same-hand advantage for precuing discrete finger responses and assumed that the advantage was a motoric, response preparation effect. In a series of experiments, Reeve and Proctor (1984) examined the precuing procedure used by Miller and concluded that the same-hand advantage is due to nonmotoric decision (stimulus-response translation) processes. Miller (1985) questioned our conclusions on the grounds that our procedures introduced new response sets and that the translation explanation cannot account for the full set of his results. These arguments are evaluated in the present observation and are found not to be supported strongly. Miller also proposed a reinterpretati on of our results that attributes the advantage to spatial coding of responses. Although his coding account is very similar to the explanation that we previously proposed, his account attributes the coding operations to response preparation processes, whereas our account assigns such operations to decision processes. Miller reported a new precuing experiment that he interpreted as support for his response preparation account. However, we derived differential predictions from the response preparation and translation accounts and found Miller's data to be more consistent with our translation account. Therefore, our conclusion still is that the samehand advantage is attributable to nonmotoric processes.
DOI：
10.1037//0096-3445.109.4.475
发表时间：
1980
期刊：
Journal of experimental psychology. General
影响因子：
--
作者：
Goodman,D;Kelso,JA
通讯作者：
Kelso,JA