WHETHER OR NOT TO DEFEND - THE INFLUENCE OF RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION
WHETHER OR NOT TO DEFEND - THE INFLUENCE OF RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/10236249309378862
复制
发表时间:
1993-01-01
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
GRANT, JWA
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
GRANT, JWA
Animals are often aggressive when competing for resources (for reviews see Huntingford and Turner, 1987; Archer, 1988). Our understanding of this phenomenon was revolutionized by Jerram Brown's (1964) concept of economic defendability. According to his model, animals will only defend resources when the benefits exceed the costs of defence or when the net benefits of defence exceed the net benefits of alternative tactics such as scrambling for the resource. The few studies that have measured both the benefits and costs of defence have supported the theory (eg Gill and Wolf, 1975; Carpenter and MacMillen, 1976; Davies and Houston, 1981; Ewald, 1985). The concept of economic defendability is now a unifying principle of behavioural ecology and a fundamental part of the theories of how spacing (eg Brown and Orians, 1970), mating (eg Emlen and Oring, 1977) and social (eg Lott, 1991) systems evolve. Brown (1964) recognized that the decision of whether or not to defend is influenced by competitor density, resource density and resource distribution in space and time. The challenge for behavioural ecologists is to predict the ecological conditions in which aggression will be used to acquire resources. The purpose of this paper is to review the current theory and to provide a selective review of the evidence about how resource distribution influences the decision to defend or not. Whenever possible, I will use examples from the fish literature to explore this link.