The feasibility of fundamental movement skill assessments for pre-school aged children
The feasibility of fundamental movement skill assessments for pre-school aged children
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/02640414.2018.1504603
复制
发表时间：
2019-02-16
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Ferrar, Katia
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Klingberg, Brooke;Schranz, Natasha;Ferrar, Katia
学前班的基本运动技能（FMS）评估可以进行早期干预；然而，尚不清楚哪些评估是可行的。本次审查的目的是系统审查FMS评估对学龄前儿童的可行性。该检索在四个数据库中进行：MEDLINE、Scopus、ERIC 和 SportsDiscus。搜索词包括“基本运动技能”和“学龄前儿童”的同义词。纳入标准为： (i) FMS 评估； (ii) 可行性数据； (iii) 对三至六岁儿童的评估； (iv) 对典型发育儿童的评估； (v) 同行评审的英文全文出版物。可行性概念（管理时间、设备、空间、评估类型、项目、培训、资格）分别编码为“差= 1MODIFIER LETTER PRIME”、“平均= 2MODIFIER LETTER PRIME”和“好= 3MODIFIER LETTER PRIME”；潜在总数为 21。总共考虑了 330 篇全文文章，但由于没有可行性数据，四分之一（n = 86）被排除在外。纳入了 65 项使用 13 种不同 FMS 评估的研究。运动技能跟踪和 DEMOST-PRE 评估是最可行的 (18/21)，儿童粗大运动发展测试和运动评估电池很常见，但最不可行 (12-14/21)。该审查允许学前教育工作人员根据可行性选择 FMS 评估。未来的研究需要提出评估的可行性。
Fundamental movement skill (FMS) assessment in preschools allows for early intervention; however it is unclear what assessments are feasible. The purpose of this review is to systematically review the feasibility of FMS assessments for pre-school aged children. The search was conducted across four databases, MEDLINE, Scopus, ERIC and SportsDiscus. Search terms included synonyms of "fundamental movement skills" and "pre-school children". Inclusion criteria were: (i) FMS assessment; (ii) feasibility data; (iii) assessment of children aged three to six years; (iv) assessment of typically developing children; and (v) peer reviewed full text publications in English. Feasibility concepts (administration time, equipment, space, assessment type, item, training, qualification) were each coded as 'poor = 1MODIFIER LETTER PRIME, 'average = 2MODIFIER LETTER PRIME and 'good = 3MODIFIER LETTER PRIME; potential total of 21. A total of 330 full text articles were considered but a quarter (n = 86) were excluded due to no feasibility data. Sixty-five studies using 13 different FMS assessments were included. The Athletic Skills Track and DEMOST-PRE assessments were most feasible (18/21) and the Test of Gross Motor Development and Movement Assessment Battery for Children were common but among the least feasible (12-14/21). This review allows pre-school staff to choose a FMS assessment based on feasibility. Future studies need to present feasibility of assessments.