Lifemirror : collective cinematic thoughts
Lifemirror : collective cinematic thoughts
复制标题
Lifemirror：集体电影思想
DOI：
10.4324/9780203826065
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Oliver Case
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Oliver Case
在线众包艺术很少受到研究人员或艺术史学家的关注[1]，在线众包电影可能更少。当贾尔斯·德勒兹在他的“电影书籍”中开始提出电影图像的第一个本体论时，他提出媒介是“思想的生产者”[2]。通过这个镜头，众包电影制作有望对图像的演变提出新的问题。由于数字技术的进步，即时和网络化的电影媒体注定要绕过传统的制作和发行系统。随着通过手机和可穿戴技术记录行为变得越来越亲密，相机的使用可能会成为一种接近于思想表达的东西。这表明需要重新评估用户生成的媒体流并调查通过摄像头连接的社区的行为。 Lifemirror 项目的启动是为了能够创建和解构未经编辑的众包电影图像，对其进行分析可能会提出移动视频实践中的设计和意义问题。借用格雷戈里·乌尔默（Gregory Ulmer）在《Teletheory》（2004）序言中的话，“我在这个过程中的目标不是解释视频，而是用它来思考”[3]。
Online crowdsourced art has received little attention from researchers or art historians [1] and online crowdsourced film perhaps even less. When Giles Deleuze began the first ontology of film image in his ‘cinema books’, he proposed the medium to be ‘a producer of ideas’ [2]. Through this lens, crowdsourced filmmaking promises to ask new questions on the evolution of the image. Due to the advancement of digital technology, instant and networked film-based media is destined to bypass traditional production and distribution systems. As recording acts become increasingly intimate through mobile phones and wearable technology, it is possible that camera use will emerge as something close to an expression of thought. This suggests a need to reevaluate the flow of user- generated media and investigate the behaviors of a camera- connected community. The Lifemirror project has been initiated to enable the creation and deconstruction of an unedited crowdsourced film image, the analysis of which might open questions of design and meaning in mobile video practices. Borrowing Gregory Ulmer’s words in his preface to Teletheory (2004), ‘My goal within this process is not to explain video, but to think with it’ [3].
德勒兹与电影的精神分裂分析
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
--
影响因子：
--
作者：
Buchanan, Ian;MacCormack, Patricia
通讯作者：
MacCormack, Patricia