Warning about War

Warning about War
复制标题

关于战争的警告

DOI:
10.1017/9781108644006
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Conflict, Security & Development
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Florian Otto
Florian Otto
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Christoph O. Meyer;C. Franco;Florian Otto

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

如何才能让有关暴力冲突和战争的警告被倾听、相信并采取行动?为什么某些来源的警告受到关注并被广泛接受,而另一些来源的警告却被忽视或不相信?这些问题对于考虑防止国家经济和安全利益受到损害的可行性至关重要。作者挑战了倾向于归咎于决策者缺乏接受性和政治意愿的传统观点,提出了一个新的理论框架,解释了不同的“说服路径”是如何由一系列选定的因素塑造的,包括冲突特征、政治背景和来源与接受者关系。这是第一项系统地将分析人士、外交官和高级官员的说服尝试与记者和非政府组织工作人员的说服尝试结合起来的研究。其雄心勃勃的比较设计涵盖三个国家(美国、英国和德国)和国际组织(联合国、欧盟和欧安组织),并深入研究了四个冲突案例:卢旺达(1994年)、达尔富尔(2003年)、格鲁吉亚(2008年)和乌克兰(2014年)。
What does it take for warnings about violent conflict and war to be listened to, believed and acted upon? Why are warnings from some sources noticed and largely accepted, while others are ignored or disbelieved? These questions are central to considering the feasibility of preventing harm to the economic and security interests of states. Challenging conventional accounts that tend to blame decision-makers' lack of receptivity and political will, the authors offer a new theoretical framework explaining how distinct'paths of persuasion'are shaped by a select number of factors, including conflict characteristics, political contexts, and source-recipient relations. This is the first study to systematically integrate persuasion attempts by analysts, diplomats and senior officials with those by journalists and NGO staff. Its ambitious comparative design encompasses three states (the US, UK, and Germany) and international organisations (the UN, EU, and OSCE) and looks in depth at four conflict cases: Rwanda (1994), Darfur (2003), Georgia (2008) and Ukraine (2014).
DOI: 10.1080/01436597.2014.924060
发表时间: 2014
影响因子: 2
作者:
Bliesemann de Guevara
通讯作者: Bliesemann de Guevara
合法化的话语过程:绘制国际刑事法院案件中的说服岛
DOI: 10.1017/s002081830909002x
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
Deitelhoff;Nicole
通讯作者: Nicole
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.460
发表时间: 1994-03-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
CHAIKEN, S;MAHESWARAN, D
通讯作者: MAHESWARAN, D