Artificial Argumentation for Humans
Artificial Argumentation for Humans
复制标题
人类的人工论证
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Villata
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Villata
最近几年，人们对人工智能（AI）的主题、它所面临的挑战以及它所取得的最新进展越来越感兴趣，例如，智能个人助理。与过去人工智能的研究主要局限于研究实验室不同，这个话题现在吸引了更广泛的受众的兴趣，包括政策制定者、信息技术公司和哲学家。遗憾的是，这些进步也引起了人们对人工智能的社会、经济和法律的影响的担忧。因此，设计原则和自动化方法的定义，以支持透明的智能机器审议是非常可取的。论证对于处理相互冲突的信念、假设、观点、目标和许多其他心理态度很重要。论证贯穿于人类的智能行为中，我相信，这是一个强制性的要素，以构思自主的人工机器，可以利用论证模型和工具，在认知任务中，他们被要求执行。这一领域的成果将有助于缩小人类和机器之间的差距，从而建立一个良好的人工智能混合社会。
The latest years have seen an increasing interest in the topic of Artificial Intelligence (AI), the challenges it is facing, and the recent advances it has achieved, e.g., intelligent personal assistants. Differently from the past, where research on AI was mainly confined in research labs, the topic is now attracting interest from a wider audience, including policy-makers, information technology companies, and philosophers. Alas, these advances have also raised a number of concerns on AI’s social, economic, and legal impact. Hence, the definition of design principles and automated methods to support transparent intelligent machine deliberation is highly desirable. Argumentation is important for handling conflicting beliefs, assumptions, opinions, goals, and many other mental attitudes. Argumentation pervades human intelligent behavior, and I believe that it is a mandatory element to conceive autonomous artificial machines that can exploit argumentation models and tools in the cognitive tasks they are required to carry out. Results in this area will allow reducing the gap between humans and machines towards a good AI hybrid society.