Global history and the spatial turn: from the impact of area studies to the study of critical junctures of globalization
Global history and the spatial turn: from the impact of area studies to the study of critical junctures of globalization
复制标题
全球历史与空间转向：从区域研究的影响到全球化关键时刻的研究
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
影响因子：
1.9
通讯作者：
Katja Naumann
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Matthias Middell;Katja Naumann
全球化可以被解释为一个去领土化和再领土化的辩证过程。对限制经济、社会文化和政治活动的现有边界的挑战，以及由于这些活动而建立的新边界，带来了某些巩固的空间结构，而与此同时，社会发展了监管制度，利用这些结构实现统治和一体化。在我们的理解中，全球历史研究导致现代全球化的全球条件的历史根源，因此应该关注领土化制度的历史性及其随着时间的推移而不断重新谈判。目前，人们对空间性的模式和适当的监管机制存在着巨大的不安全感。本文首先概述了当前的不确定性和当代全球化的两个进一步特征。第二部分审查了全球历史领域关于去领土化和再领土化进程的讨论。在第三部分中，我们提出了三个类别，这三个类别既可以作为研究议程，也可以作为一个视角，据此可以构建和叙述全球化的历史。
Abstract Globalization can be interpreted as a dialectical process of de- and re-territorialization. The challenges to existing borders that limit economic, socio-cultural, and political activities, and the establishment of new borders as the result of such activities, bring about certain consolidated structures of spatiality, while at the same time societies develop regulatory regimes to use these structures for purposes of dominance and integration. Global history in our understanding investigates the historical roots of those global conditions that have led to modern globalization and should therefore focus on the historicity of regimes of territorialization and their permanent renegotiation over time. There is, at present, a massive insecurity about patterns of spatiality and appropriate regulatory mechanisms. This article begins with a sketch of this current uncertainty and of two further characteristics of contemporary globalization. The second part examines discussions in the field of global history with regard to processes of de- and re-territorialization. In the third part, we suggest three categories that can serve both as a research agenda and as a perspective according to which a history of globalization can be constructed and narrated.