COMPARISON OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS IN NUTRITIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGY - WEIGHED RECORDS V 24-H RECALLS, FOOD-FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRES AND ESTIMATED-DIET RECORDS
COMPARISON OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT METHODS IN NUTRITIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGY - WEIGHED RECORDS V 24-H RECALLS, FOOD-FREQUENCY QUESTIONNAIRES AND ESTIMATED-DIET RECORDS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1079/bjn19940064
复制
发表时间：
1994-10-01
影响因子：
3.6
通讯作者：
DAY, NE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BINGHAM, SA;GILL, C;DAY, NE
研究人员要求年龄在50至65岁之间的女性（160人）在1年的时间里，用便携式电子磁带记录自动秤（PETRA）对食物进行4天的称重，共4次。在这一年中，他们被要求完成其他七种饮食评估方法：简单的24小时回忆，使用照片评估份量的结构化24小时回忆，两份食物频率问卷，7天估计记录或开放式食物日记，结构化食物频率（菜单）记录，以及使用照片评估份量的结构化食物频率（菜单）记录。将16天的平均称重记录与每种方法的首次呈现进行比较表明，食物频率调查问卷在将个体置于习惯饮食分布中并不明显优于24小时回忆，部分原因是对食物消耗频率的估计不准确。然而，对于7天的估计记录或开放式食物日记，个人营养价值与从16天称重记录中获得的营养价值最密切相关，并且平均食物或营养摄入量没有显着差异。
Women (rr 160) aged 50 to 65 years were asked to weigh their food for 4 d on four occasions over the period of 1 year, using the PETRA (Portable Electronic Tape Recorded Automatic) scales. Throughout the year, they were asked to complete seven other dietary assessment methods: a simple 24 h recall, a structured 24 h recall with portion size assessments using photographs, two food-frequency questionnaires, a 7 d estimated record or open-ended food diary, a structured food-frequency (menu) record, and a structured food-frequency (menu) record with portion sizes assessed using photographs. Comparisons between the average of the 16 d weighed records and the first presentation of each method indicated that food-frequency questionnaires were not appreciably better at placing individuals in the distribution of habitual diet than 24 h recalls, due partly to inaccuracies in the estimation of frequency of food consumption. With a 7 d estimated record or open-ended food diary, however, individual values of nutrients were most closely associated with those obtained from 16 d weighed records, and there were no significant differences in average food or nutrient intakes.