Ten tips for reflexive bracketing
Ten tips for reflexive bracketing
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/104973239900900309
复制
发表时间：
1999-05-01
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Ahern, KJ
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ahern, KJ
尽管认识到在定性研究中既不可能实现完全客观性，也不一定是可取的，但研究人员常常需要搁置假设，以便在研究分析和报告中反映受访者的真实经历。在许多定性出版物和会议演讲中，研究人员报告说他们已经尝试过这一过程，但通常没有说明进行这种尝试的方式。在这篇文章中，作者提供了指导，帮助定性研究人员利用反身性来识别潜在偏见的领域，并将它们“括起来”，以便将它们对研究过程的影响降到最低。
Despite the realization that total objectivity is neither achievable nor necessarily desirable in qualitative research, researchers often are required to put aside assumptions so that the true experiences of respondents are reflected in the analysis and reporting of research. In many qualitative publications and conference presentations, researchers report that they have attempted this process, but the means by which this attempt was made often are not explicated. lit this article, the author provides guidance to help qualitative researchers use reflexivity to identify areas of potential bias and to "bracket" them so their influence on the research process is minimal.