The glossed manuscript: classbook or library book?
The glossed manuscript: classbook or library book?
复制标题
注释手稿：教科书还是图书馆书籍？
DOI：
10.1017/s0263675100001320
复制
发表时间：
1985
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gernot R. Wieland
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gernot R. Wieland
在最近的一篇文章中，迈克尔·拉皮奇（Michael Lapidge）警告学术界不要轻易认为任何带有注释的中世纪手稿一定会在课堂上使用。他指出，相同的注释经常出现在几份手稿中，迫使我们得出结论，注释要么是与文本一起复制的，要么是来自评论的。注释自然比文本表现出更多的多样性，因为抄写员可以随意省略它们、更改它们或添加它们。尽管如此，相同的注解出现在几份手稿中这一事实表明它们并不是教师或学生的自发反应。
In a recent article, Michael Lapidge has cautioned the scholarly world not to assume too readily that any glossed medieval manuscript was necessarily used in the schoolroom. Identical glosses, he points out, often appear in several manuscripts, forcing us to conclude that glosses were either copied along with the text or from a commentary. The glosses naturally show greater variety than the texts because the scribe could at will omit them, change them, or add to them. Nonetheless, the fact that the same glosses appear in several manuscripts indicates that they were not the spontaneous reactions of a teacher or student.