Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)

Comparison of gadoxetic acid versus gadopentetate dimeglumine for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at 1.5 T using the liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS v.2017)
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s40644-018-0183-3
复制
发表时间:
2018-12-07
期刊:
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Zeng, Mengsu
Zeng, Mengsu
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ding, Ying;Rao, Sheng-xiang;Zeng, Mengsu

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:本研究的目的是研究肝脏成像报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)v. 2017,用于对钆塞酸与钆喷酸二甲胺增强的1.5-T磁共振成像(MRI)进行比较的肝细胞癌(HCC)分类。材料和方法:我们纳入了141例高危患者,其中145例经病理证实的HCC,他们首先接受了钆喷酸二甲胺增强的1.5-T,然后是钆塞酸增强的1.5-T。T核磁共振成像。两名独立的放射科医生评估了主要HCC特征的存在或不存在,并在考虑两次MRI的辅助特征后分配了LI-RADS类别。最后,使用Wilcoxon检验比较钆塞酸和钆喷酸二甲胺增强的1.5 T MRI之间LI-RADS 5类(LR-5)的灵敏度和主要HCC特征的频率。LR-5在钆塞酸和钆喷酸二甲胺增强MRI中诊断HCC的敏感性有显著差异(73.8% [107/145] vs 26.2% [38/145],P < 0.001; 71% [103/145] vs 29% [42/145],P < 0.001)。在主要的HCC LI-RADS特征中,钆塞酸增强MRI比钆喷酸二甲胺增强MRI更少显示包膜(3.4% [5/145] vs 5.5% [8/145],P = 0.793; 4.1% [6/145] vs 5.5% [8/145],P = 0.87,分别针对审查者1和2),钆喷酸葡胺组与钆喷酸葡胺组的动脉增强发生率无显著性差异(89% [129/145] vs 89% [129/145],P = 1.000)。此外,钆塞酸增强MRI上,移行期(TP)出现洗脱的频率低于门静脉期(PVP(43% [46/107] vs 57% [61/107],P = 0.367)。对于肝癌的诊断,钆乙酸增强MRI显示出与钆喷酸二甲胺增强MRI相当的灵敏度,根据LI-RADS v. 2017,考虑到主要特征,LI-RADS 4类(LR-4)肝结节升级为LR-5。
Purpose: The goal of this study was to investigate the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v. 2017 for the categorization of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) with gadoxetic acid compared with gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Material and methods: We included 141 high-risk patients with 145 pathologically-confirmed HCCs who first underwent gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T followed by gadoxetic acid-enhanced 1.5-T MRI. Two independent radiologists evaluated the presence or absence of major HCC features and assigned LI-RADS categories after considering ancillary features on both MRIs. Finally, the sensitivity of LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) and the frequencies of major HCC features were compared between gadoxetic acid-and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced 1.5-T MRI using the Wilcoxon test.Results: The sensitivity of LR-5 for diagnosing HCCs was significantly different between gadoxetic acid-and gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (73.8% [107/145] vs 26.2% [38/145], P < 0.001; 71% [103/145] vs 29% [42/145], P < 0.001 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively). Among the major HCC LI-RADS features, capsule appearance was less frequently demonstrated on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI than on gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI (3.4% [5/145] vs 5.5% [8/145], P = 0.793; 4.1% [6/145] vs 5.5% [8/145], P = 0.87 for reviewers 1 and 2, respectively), and the frequency of arterial hyperenhancement was not significantly different between gadoxetic acid and gadopentetate dimeglumine (89% [129/145] vs 89% [129/145], P = 1.000). In addition, the frequency of a washout appearance was less in the transitional phase (TP) than in the portal venous phase (PVP) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI (43% [46/107] vs 57% [61/107], P = 0.367).Conclusion: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI showed a comparable sensitivity to gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of HCCs, and LI-RADS category 4 (LR-4) hepatic nodules were upgraded to LR-5 when taking into account the major features according to LI-RADS v. 2017.