An Evaluation of the Partially-Resolved Numerical Simulation Procedure For Near-Wall Turbulence Prediction

An Evaluation of the Partially-Resolved Numerical Simulation Procedure For Near-Wall Turbulence Prediction
复制标题

DOI:
10.2514/6.2006-115
复制
发表时间:
2006-01
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Xiaodan Cai;F. Ladeinde
Xiaodan Cai;F. Ladeinde
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Xiaodan Cai;F. Ladeinde

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

* †在本文中,我们试图评估新提出的近壁湍流预测的PRNS程序。将PRNS程序与低雷诺数湍流模型(Abid版本)相结合,计算了二维平板边界流、二维和三维后台阶流的近壁湍流结构。我们发现,与相应的RANS模型相比,具有固定模型常数()的PRNS程序通常预测较弱的湍流结构。有人怀疑近壁网格尺寸可能不适合38的PRNS计算。0 = cp R 38。0 = cp R.在这个问题上肯定需要更多的研究。此外,PRNS程序解决大尺度能量湍流结构的能力和实用性需要进一步评估。
*† In this paper, we attempt to evaluate the newly-proposed PRNS procedures for near-wall turbulence prediction. The PRNS procedure is combined with the low-Reynolds number turbulent model (Abid’s version) to calculate the near-wall turbulent structures in twodimensional flat-plate boundary flows, two-dimensional and three-dimensional backardfacing step flows. We have found that the PRNS procedure with the fixed model constant ( ) generally predicts weaker turbulent structures as compared to its corresponding RANS model. It is suspected that the near-wall grid size may not be suitable for the PRNS calculations with 38 . 0 = cp R 38 . 0 = cp R . More studies are surely needed on this subject. Furthermore, the capability and usefulness of the PRNS procedures on resolving large-scale energetic turbulent structures require further evaluations.