You may have worked on more adaptive designs than you think.
You may have worked on more adaptive designs than you think.
复制标题
您的适应性设计可能比您想象的要多。
DOI:
10.1161/strokeaha.114.004288
复制
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
影响因子:
8.3
通讯作者:
Coffey,ChristopherS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Coffey,ChristopherS
Stochastic curtailment methods are generally used for assessing futility. 3 With this approach, a trial should be stopped if one can predict the outcome of the trial with high probability given the current data at an interim stage. For example, if the interim data suggest that the trial is unlikely to be positive, strong consideration should be made to terminating the trial. The most common approach for assessing futility is the use of conditional power, the probability that the test statistic at the final stage will be rejected given the observed statistic and assuming the prespecified effect for future observations. Hence, if an unfavorable trend is observed at an interim analysis, the conditional power represents the probability that the unfavorable trend might be reversed by the end of the trial. If the conditional power is below some prespecified threshold, typically 10% to 20%, the trial may be stopped for futility. However, this approach has been criticized because computing conditional power under the originally assumed alternative when the observed effect is near the null value may falsely overstate the true power and subsequently make it less likely the trial will stop for futility. A predictive power approach alleviates this problem by computing a weighted average of the conditional power values of the posterior distribution of the treatment difference given the observed data. As with conditional power, predictive power can be used to define a formal futility stopping rule.