Comparison of sleep estimation using wrist actigraphy and waist actigraphy in healthy young adults
Comparison of sleep estimation using wrist actigraphy and waist actigraphy in healthy young adults
复制标题
使用手腕体动记录仪和腰部体动记录仪对健康年轻人进行睡眠评估的比较
DOI：
10.1111/sbr.12048
复制
发表时间：
2014
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
Tetsuo Shimizu
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Masahiro Takeshima;Masaru Echizenya;Yoshiyuki Inomata;Kazumi Shimizu;Tetsuo Shimizu
本研究的目的是比较健康年轻受试者使用腕动记录仪和腰动记录仪的睡眠同步分析。我们研究了102名健康的大学生（55名男性，47名女性），年龄在18-40岁之间。参与者被指示连续7个晚上继续正常的生活活动和睡眠-觉醒节律，没有异常事件。使用Octagonal Basic Motionlogger Actigraph（活动记录仪）测量腕部活动记录仪，使用Lifecorder PLUS记录腰部活动记录仪。分析了95名参与者的633个夜晚的数据，以确定睡眠开始潜伏期，觉醒事件，睡眠开始后觉醒（WASO），床上时间，总睡眠时间（TST）和睡眠效率（SE）。两种方法测量的入睡潜伏期和卧床时间无显著性差异。觉醒次数（F1，1265= 126.39，P < 0.001）、WASO（F1，1265= 1139.39，P < 0.001）、TST（F1，1265= 275.21，P < 0.001）和SE（F1，1265= 1258.31，P < 0.001）的测量结果存在显著差异。发现Lifecorder相对于活动记录仪大大高估了WASO，导致相对于活动记录仪相应低估了TST和SE。我们在这群年轻健康成年人中的研究结果确定了两种量化睡眠方法之间的重要相似性和差异。
The aim of this study was to compare the simultaneous analysis of sleep using wrist actigraphy and waist actigraphy in healthy young subjects. We studied 102 healthy university students (55 men, 47 women), aged 18–40 years. Participants were instructed to continue normal life activities and sleep—wake rhythms for 7 consecutive nights without extraordinary events. Wrist actigraphy was measured using the Octagonal Basic Motionlogger Actigraph (actigraph), and waist actigraphy was recorded using the Lifecorder PLUS. Data for 633 nights from 95 participants were analyzed to determine sleep onset latency, wake episodes, wake after sleep onset (WASO), time in bed, total sleep time (TST) and sleep efficiency (SE). No significant differences were found between the two methods for the measurement of sleep onset latency and time in bed. Significant differences in measurements were identified for wake episodes (F1,1265= 126.39,P< 0.001), WASO (F1,1265= 1139.39,P< 0.001), TST (F1,1265= 275.21,P< 0.001), and SE (F1,1265= 1258.31,P< 0.001). The Lifecorder was found to considerably overestimate WASO relativetothe actigraph, leadingto a corresponding underestimation of TST and SE relative to the actigraph. Our results in this population of young healthy adults identify important similarities and differences between the two methods for quantifying sleep.