Cue familiarity and 'don't know' responding in episodic memory tasks
Cue familiarity and 'don't know' responding in episodic memory tasks
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.005
复制
发表时间：
2013-10-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Mazzoni, Giuliana
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hanczakowski, Maciej;Pasek, Tomasz;Mazzoni, Giuliana
元认知监控和元认知控制是人们调节记忆中编码和提取过程的两种相互依赖的机制。虽然关于监控以及监控过程的结果如何影响编码的控制已知很多，但关于提取调控的监控关系的证据要少得多。本研究通过评估已知的影响提取时元认知监控的因素，即线索熟悉度，是否也影响提取时的元认知控制(即在记忆任务中自愿或保留反应的决定)来提供关于这一点的信息。在七个实验中，通过让参与者事先对一半的关键线索做出愉悦判断来操纵线索熟悉度。结果表明，线索熟悉性不仅影响对知情感和回溯性自信的元认知判断，而且还影响不同再认任务的“不知道”反应。这些结果表明，一个已知的影响元认知监控的因素也决定了自愿或保留反应的决定(元认知控制)，这反过来又决定了参与者在记忆任务中的表现。(C)2013 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。
Metacognitive monitoring and control are two interdependent mechanisms by which people regulate encoding and retrieval processes in memory. While much is known about monitoring, and how the results of monitoring processes affect control at encoding, much less evidence is available for the monitoring-control relationship with respect to the regulation of retrieval. The present study provides information on this point by assessing whether a factor that is known to affect metacognitive monitoring at retrieval, i.e. cue familiarity, affects also metacognitive control at retrieval (i.e. the decision to volunteer or withhold a response in a memory task). In seven experiments cue familiarity was manipulated by having participants make a pleasantness judgment beforehand for half of the critical cues. Results showed that cue familiarity affected not only metacognitive judgments of feeling-of-knowing and retrospective confidence, but also the rate of 'don't know' responses in different recognition tasks. These results demonstrate that a factor known to affect metacognitive monitoring determines also the decision to volunteer or withhold a response (metacognitive control), which in turn shapes participants' performance in a memory task. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.