Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings
Accessibility appraisal of land-use/transport policy strategies: More than just adding up travel-time savings
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.006
复制
发表时间：
2010-10-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
de Bok, Michiel
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Geurs, Karst;Zondag, Barry;de Bok, Michiel
我们研究了与荷兰的一些土地利用政策战略，预计预期的气候变化的可访问性的好处。使用荷兰国家土地利用/交通相互作用模型TIGRIS XL的非汇总对数和可访问性措施被用来计算消费者剩余的变化。该措施提供了一个优雅和方便的解决方案来衡量充分的无障碍的好处，从土地使用和/或运输政策，离散选择旅行需求模型时，已经产生对数。它既考虑了一般运输成本的变化，也考虑了目的地效用的变化，因此能够提供因运输或土地使用政策而引起的活动分布变化所带来的无障碍好处。案例研究表明，与公路和公共交通基础设施的投资方案相比，土地使用政策战略的对数可达性效益可能相当大，这主要是由于出行量和目的地效用的变化，而这并不是用标准的一半规则效益衡量标准来衡量的。(C)2010爱思唯尔有限公司保留所有权利。
We examine the accessibility benefits associated with some land-use policy strategies for the Netherlands that anticipate on expected climate change. A disaggregate logsum accessibility measure using the Dutch national land-use/transport interaction model TIGRIS XL is used to compute changes in consumer surplus. The measure provides an elegant and convenient solution to measure the full accessibility benefits from land-use and/or transport policies, when discrete choice travel-demand models are available that already produce logsums. It accounts for both changes in generalised transport costs and changes in destination utility, and is thus capable of providing the accessibility benefits from changes in the distribution of activities, due to transport or land-use policies. The case study shows that logsum accessibility benefits from land-use policy strategies can be quite large compared to investment programmes for road and public transport infrastructure, largely due to changes in trip production and destination utility, which are not measured in the standard rule-of-half benefit measure. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.