Olympic Weightlifting Training for Sprint Performance in Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.
Olympic Weightlifting Training for Sprint Performance in Athletes: A Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.
复制标题
奥运会举重训练对运动员冲刺表现的影响：系统评价与荟萃分析。
DOI：
10.1055/a-2161-4867
复制
发表时间：
2024
影响因子：
2.5
通讯作者：
Pozzi,Federico
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Crenshaw,Kristen;Zeppieri,Giorgio;Hung,Cheng-Ju;Schmitfranz,Tania;McCall,Patti;Castellini,Greta;Gianola,Silvia;Pozzi,Federico
这项系统性综述和荟萃分析旨在确定奥运会是否 举重（OW）练习将提高短跑成绩相比， 控制干预，（无训练，标准运动特定训练， 传统的阻力训练，或称运动训练）。Medline，Web of 科学，SportDiscus，CINAHL和生物科学从成立到9月 第2022章被查了两名作者独立选择纳入的研究， 提取数据，并评估偏倚风险。证据的重要性在于 使用建议分级评估、开发和 评价方法。主要荟萃分析结合了 在每个冲刺测试的整个长度上的冲刺表现。次级 荟萃分析结合了5岁、10岁和15岁时的短跑成绩， 20米的距离，以捕捉有关的加速阶段的信息， 冲刺测试8项研究，206名运动员（女性n=10，年龄范围： 18.9-24.2岁）。短跑成绩没有差异 将OW与对照干预进行显著比较， （标准化平均差异=-0.07，95%） CI=-0.47至0.34，p =0.75， I2=46%）或加速阶段 （p≥0.26）。OW训练不能提高短跑成绩 在很大程度上，它比其他干预措施更有效。
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine whether Olympic weightlifting (OW) exercises would improve sprint performance when compared to a control intervention, (no training, standard sport-specific training, traditional resistance training, or plyometric training). Medline, Web of Science, SportDiscus, CINAHL, and Biological Science from inception to September 2022 was searched. Two authors independently selected the included studies, extracted data, and appraised the risk of bias. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. The primary meta-analysis combined the results of the sprint performance over the full length of each sprint test. The secondary meta-analyses combined the results of the sprint performance at 5, 10, and 20 m distance to capture information about the acceleration phase of the sprint tests. Eight studies with 206 athletes (female n=10, age range: 18.9–24.2 years) were identified. Sprint performance did not differ significantly comparing OW to the control intervention, nor at the full length (standardized mean difference=–0.07, 95% CI=–0.47 to 0.34,p=0.75, I2=46%) or during the acceleration phase (p≥0.26) of the sprint test. OW training does not improve sprint performance to a greater extent than comparator interventions.