Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications
Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications
复制标题
DOI：
10.1017/s0030605316001228
复制
发表时间：
2017-07-01
期刊：
影响因子：
2.7
通讯作者：
Shanker, Kartik
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Buscher, Bram;Fletcher, Robert;Shanker, Kartik
我们质疑将半个地球变成保护区网络的日益流行的激进想法是否可行或公正。我们认为，这个半地球计划将对人类种群产生广泛的负面影响，并不能实现其保护目标。它没有提出在半个地球上管理生物多样性的议程。相反，我们呼吁采取更有效、更公平的激进行动，直接关注生物多样性丧失的主要驱动因素，改变全球经济目前的增长基础，同时解决不平等问题。
We question whether the increasingly popular, radical idea of turning half the Earth into a network of protected areas is either feasible or just. We argue that this Half-Earth plan would have widespread negative consequences for human populations and would not meet its conservation objectives. It offers no agenda for managing biodiversity within a human half of Earth. We call instead for alternative radical action that is both more effective and more equitable, focused directly on the main drivers of biodiversity loss by shifting the global economy from its current foundation in growth while simultaneously redressing inequality.