Soil Quality for Sustainable Land Management: Organic Matter and Aggregation Interactions that Maintain Soil Functions
Soil Quality for Sustainable Land Management: Organic Matter and Aggregation Interactions that Maintain Soil Functions
复制标题
DOI:
10.2134/agronj2002.3800
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
2.1
通讯作者:
M. R. Carter
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
M. R. Carter
is seen as a basic premise of soil quality (Larson and Pierce, 1991, 1994). If a soil is not suitable for a specific Soil quality concepts are commonly used to evaluate sustainable use, then it is not appropriate to attempt to assign or land management in agroecosystems. The objectives of this review were to trace the importance of soil organic matter (SOM) in Canadian describe quality for that specific use or function. In many sustainable land management studies and illustrate the role of SOM cases, however, it is not possible to make a perfect match and aggregation in sustaining soil functions. Canadian studies on soil between the soil and its intended use. Under these cirquality were initiated in the early 1980s and showed that loss of SOM cumstances, quality must be built into the system using and soil aggregate stability were standard features of nonsustainable best management scenarios. land use. Subsequent studies have evaluated SOM quality using the Ecosystem concepts such as function, processes, attrifollowing logical sequence: soil purpose and function, processes, prop- butes, and indicators, have proved to be a useful frameerties and indicators, and methodology. Limiting steps in this soil work to describe soil quality (Larson and Pierce, 1991, quality framework are the questions of critical limits and standardiza1994; Doran and Parkin, 1994; Doran et al., 1996; Carter tion for soil properties. At present, critical limits for SOM are selected et al., 1997; Karlen et al., 1997). However, a precise using a commonly accepted reference value or based on empirically derived relations between SOM and a specific soil process or function definition of soil quality proves to be elusive. This is (e.g., soil fertility, productivity, or erodibility). Organic matter frac- probably related to the innate difficulty in defining soil tions (e.g., macro-organic matter, light fraction, microbial biomass, itself and to the multifaceted nature (i.e., scientific, perand mineralizable C) describe the quality of SOM. These fractions sonal, and social) of environmental concerns. Carter and have biological significance for several soil functions and processes MacEwan (1996) suggested that although soil quality and are sensitive indicators of changes in total SOM. Total SOM describes an objective state or condition of the soil, it influences soil compactibility, friability, and soil water-holding capac- also is subjective, i.e., evaluated partly on the basis of ity while aggregated SOM has major implications for the functioning personal and social determinations. The above frameof soil in regulating air and water infiltration, conserving nutrients, work of soil quality has utility when it is directed or and influencing soil permeability and erodibility. Overall, organic focused towards the manipulation, engineering, and/or matter inputs, the dynamics of the sand-sized macro-organic matter, and the soil aggregation process are important factors in maintaining management of the soil resource. Thus, soil quality is a and regulating organic matter functioning in soil. technology, an applied science, directed towards better soil management. The objective of this paper is to review the context