Fixed Drug Eruption: Easily Overlooked but Needing New Respect
Fixed Drug Eruption: Easily Overlooked but Needing New Respect
复制标题
固定药疹:很容易被忽视,但需要新的尊重
DOI:
10.1159/000063891
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Y. Mizukawa
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
T. Shiohara;Y. Mizukawa
Classic fixed drug eruptions (FDE) are easily identified by hyperpigmented lesions that recur in exactly the same areas on each administration of the causative drug. In cases with skin lesions lacking this characteristic hyperpigmentation, however, identification of the lesions as being ‘fixed’is difficult to document: because the shade of the pigmentation tends to become darker with each succeeding exacerbation, it would be quite difficult to recognize the FDE lesions after a few episodes in patients with lighter-hued skin. In lighter-hued skin, the color of such lesions would remain purplish gray even after numerous episodes. In this regard, Shelley and Shelley [1] described a nonpigmenting variant of FDE, in which the lesions are symmetric and not followed by pigmentation. Although this nonpigmenting form was originally defined as showing a symmetric distribution, it has become clear that the nonpigmenting form can also appear as a solitary lesion, just like the classic form [2]. Nevertheless, because of the relatively low penetration of this entity, these unusual forms are frequently misdiagnosed as idiopathic skin diseases, depending on the mode of clinical presentation. How then can these unusual forms be diagnosed unless the possibility of drug eruptions is considered in the differential diagnosis?In order to provide a background for a framework on which to approach these difficult questions, it would be important to consider why FDE lesions are initially found in a particular area of predilection. In the current issue of Dermatology, we show that some multiple FDE lesions initially appeared at previously traumatized skin sites, such as burn scars and insect bites [3]. This case report provides insights into the pathogenesis of FDE with important implications for its etiology. Points of emphasis include the nature of the initiating events capable of producing FDE lesions, and the analogy with the phenomenon known as ‘isomorphic’or ‘isotopic response’: the terms ‘isomorphic’and ‘isotopic’response describe the occurrence of a new,‘unrelated’disease that appears with exactly the same morphologic features and at precisely the same location, respectively, as a previously already healed disease. Many reports in the literature describe the occurrence of a ‘second’disease in areas previously exposed to irradiation, traumas, burns, vaccination or a viral disease (herpes zoster or herpes simplex). The ‘isomorphic’or ‘isotopic’phenomenon has been well documented in erythema multiforme (EM): in most cases of EM, skin lesions preferentially occur at sites of previous skin trauma and recent sun exposure [4]. Careful attention should be given to the fact that in recent years similar phenomena have been reported under the different term ‘recall’or ‘recall-like’phenomenon [5, 6]: in the latter, the drug reactions occur at sites of previous sunburns in which the sunburn-induced inflammation has resolved long before the recall event [7]. Skin lesions of EM may also bear resemblance to FDE, particularly a nonpigmenting form, and some cases of EM showing the ‘isomorphic’or ‘photo recall-like phenomenon’may actually be FDE with skin lesions confined to previously traumatized or sunburned skin (fig. 1). Indeed, previous reports describe that skin lesions thought to represent typical EM were reproduced by challenge with the causative drug [8], and that the generalized bullous form of FDE seen in children was most often misdiagnosed as insect bite reaction [9]. Thus, initial skin lesions of unusual forms such as a nonpigmenting form of FDE would be easily overlooked unless clinicians take special care to recognize the presence of such unusual forms. Because it would be …