Nab-Paclitaxel in combination with Cisplatin Versus Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Nab-Paclitaxel in combination with Cisplatin Versus Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/s41598-017-11404-9
复制
发表时间:
2017-09-07
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Jiao S
Jiao S
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Chen Y;Li J;Chen S;Zhang Y;Hu Y;Zhang G;Yan X;Jiao S

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

白蛋白结合紫杉醇(nab-PC)和多西紫杉醇作为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗均具有良好的疗效和安全性。然而,nab-PC与多西紫杉醇的比较目前尚不清楚。本回顾性研究旨在比较nab-PC/顺铂与多西他赛/顺铂作为一线治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效和安全性。本研究回顾了2012年至2016年接受nab-PC(55例)或多西他赛(216例)治疗的271例晚期NSCLC患者。主要终点为客观总有效率(ORR)。次要终点是疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。Nab-PC的ORR显著高于多西紫杉醇(47.3% vs 31.9%; P = 0.033)。鳞状组织患者的ORR差异更为显著(58.3% vs 29.0%; P = 0.007)。此外,nab-PC的DCR显著高于多西他赛。与多西他赛组相比,nab-PC组患者的PFS和OS均有改善的趋势,但差异无统计学意义。nab-PC组≥3级中性粒细胞减少较少,多西紫杉醇组≥3级贫血和血小板减少较少。Nab-PC/顺铂作为一线治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效明显高于多西紫杉醇/顺铂,且中性粒细胞减少明显减少。
Albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PC) and docetaxel both produced favorable efficacy and safety as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between nab-PC and docetaxel remained unclear until now. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-PC/cisplatin with docetaxel/cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced NSCLC. 271 patients with advanced NSCLC, who received either nab-PC (55 patients) or docetaxel (216 patients) were reviewed from 2012 to 2016. The primary endpoint was objective overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety profiles. Nab-PC presented a significantly higher ORR than docetaxel (47.3% vs 31.9%; P = 0.033). The difference of ORR was more significantly remarkable in patients with squamous histology (58.3% vs 29.0%; P = 0.007). Additionally, the DCR of nab-PC was significantly higher than docetaxel. Patients in nab-PC group had a trend toward improved PFS and OS compared with patients in docetaxel group, but this didn’t reach statistical significance. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was less in nab-PC group, while Grade ≥ 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia were less in docetaxel group. Nab-PC/cisplatin as first-line therapy, produced significantly higher efficacy and reduced neutropenia than docetaxel/cisplatin in advanced NSCLC.
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25659
发表时间: 2011-04-15
期刊: CANCER
影响因子: 6.2
作者:
Kottschade, Lisa A.;Suman, Vera J.;Amatruda, Thomas, III;McWilliams, Robert R.;Mattar, Bassam I.;Nikcevich, Daniel A.;Behrens, Robert;Fitch, Tom R.;Jaslowski, Anthony J.;Markovic, Svetomir N.
通讯作者: Markovic, Svetomir N.
DOI: 10.1097/cad.0b013e32830f9046
发表时间: 2008-10-01
期刊: ANTI-CANCER DRUGS
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Desai, Neil P.;Trieu, Vuong;Gradishar, William J.
通讯作者: Gradishar, William J.
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00287-1
发表时间: 1998-12-01
影响因子: 8.4
作者:
Le Chevalier, T;Monnier, A;Bérille, J
通讯作者: Bérille, J
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2003.12.046
发表时间: 2003-08-15
影响因子: 45.3
作者:
Fossella, F;Pereira, JR;Belani, CP
通讯作者: Belani, CP