IDEAL VERSUS OUGHT PREDILECTIONS FOR APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE - DISTINCT SELF-REGULATORY SYSTEMS
IDEAL VERSUS OUGHT PREDILECTIONS FOR APPROACH AND AVOIDANCE - DISTINCT SELF-REGULATORY SYSTEMS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.276
复制
发表时间：
1994-02-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
HYMES, C
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
HIGGINS, ET;RONEY, CJR;HYMES, C
使用不同范式的两项研究激活了理想自我引导(一个人的希望或愿望)或应该自我引导(一个人的责任感和责任感)，并通过不同形式的自我调节测量了学生的关注度：接近与期望结束状态的匹配或与不期望结束状态的不匹配，避免与期望结束状态的不匹配或与不希望的结束状态的匹配。第三项研究要求理想和应该不同的学生在不同的友谊策略中进行选择。结果表明，对方法的关注比对理想自我调节的关注更大，而对回避的关注更多的是对应该的关注而不是理想的自我调节。
Two studies using different paradigms activated either ideal self-guides (a person's hopes or wishes) or ought self-guides (a person's sense of duty and responsibility) and measured Ss' concern with different forms of self-regulation: approaching matches to desired end states or mismatches to undesired end states and avoiding mismatches to desired end states or matches to undesired end states. A 3rd study asked ideal versus ought discrepant Ss to select among alternative strategies for friendship. The results suggest that a concern with approach is greater for ideal than ought self-regulation, whereas a concern with avoidance is greater for ought than ideal self-regulation.