Interview format influences the accuracy of children's dietary recalls validated with observations
Interview format influences the accuracy of children's dietary recalls validated with observations
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/s0271-5317(03)00179-9
复制
发表时间：
2003-11-01
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
Frye, FHA
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Baxter, SD;Smith, AF;Frye, FHA
这份报告描述了一个比较的准确性，儿童的饮食回忆获得无论是开放式或膳食形式的采访。四年级学生被随机选择，观察吃学校餐（早餐，午餐），并接受采访，晚上就当天的摄入量与儿童随机分配到开放（n = 12）或吃饭（n = 11）格式采访。观察到吃的项目的加权数没有不同的格式，但更大的加权数的项目被报告吃了膳食格式的采访比开放格式的采访。报告性能更准确的开放式比用餐格式的采访：虽然遗漏率没有显着差异的格式，更高的入侵率和总的不准确性，发现在用餐格式的采访比开放式的采访。访谈格式影响儿童的饮食报告的准确性，特别是，提供膳食线索提高虚假报告。这些分析表明，在审查报告业绩时，必须分别处理遗漏和侵入问题。(C)2003爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
This report describes a comparison of the accuracy of children's dietary recalls obtained using either open or meal format interviews. Fourth-graders were randomly selected, observed eating school meals (breakfast, lunch), and interviewed that evening regarding that day's intake with children randomly assigned to open (n = 12) or meal (n = 11) format interviews. The weighted numbers of items observed eaten did not differ by format, but greater weighted numbers of items were reported eaten with meal format interviews than with open format interviews. Reporting performance was more accurate with open than with meal format interviews: Although the omission rates did not differ significantly between the formats, higher intrusion rates and total inaccuracy were found in meal format interviews than in open format interviews. Interview format influences children's dietary reporting accuracy; in particular, providing meal cues elevates false reports. These analyses exemplify the importance of treating omissions and intrusions separately when examining reporting performance. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.