The graphic rating scale
The graphic rating scale
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/h0074329
复制
发表时间：
1923-01-01
影响因子：
4.9
通讯作者：
Freyd, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Freyd, M
在客观数据不可行或不可能的情况下，评级作为心理测量装置的重要性作为本研究的介绍进行了讨论。高尔顿、唐尼和普兰特的评定量表完整地给出，并描述了11种不同的构造量表的方法。考虑了确定评定量表可靠性的标准，以及对该方法提出的各种批评。图形评定量表起源于斯科特公司的实验室在1920年，是所有后来的变化的基础。这种方法的优点如下：简单、有趣、快速填写、容易评分，评分者不需要定量术语，描述性术语帮助评分者，它不需要像陆军量表那样的主量表，而且评分的精细程度可以随意改变。尽管作者列举了一些注意事项，并给出了一些构建量表的规则，但仍发现该方法具有很高的信度相关性。弗雷德强烈支持图形评级方法，并在结论中说明了它可以用于的各种用途。摘自《心理通报》20:07:00802。（PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2022 APA，版权所有）
The importance of ratings as a psychological measuring device where objective data are impracticable or impossible, is discussed as an introduction to this study. Rating scales from Galton, Downey, and Plant are given in full and eleven different methods of constructing scales are described. The criteria for determining the reliability of rating scales are considered, as are the various criticisms that have been made against the method. The graphic rating scale was originated in the Scott Co.'s laboratory in 1920 and is the basis of all later variations. Advantages of this method are stated as follows: simple, interesting, quickly filled out, easily scored, the rater is freed from quantitative terms, the descriptive terms aid the rater, it requires no master scale as does the Army Scale, and the fineness of the scoring may be altered at will. High correlations of reliability have been found for this method though the author enumerates certain cautions and gives a number of rules for the construction of scales. Freyd strongly endorses the graphic rating method and states in conclusion the various uses to which it can be put. From Psych Bulletin 20: 07: 00802.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)