Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation - Description and an illustration
Leverage-saliency theory of survey participation - Description and an illustration
复制标题
DOI：
10.1086/317990
复制
发表时间：
2000-09-01
影响因子：
3.4
通讯作者：
Corning, A
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Groves, RM;Singer, E;Corning, A
调查参与的文献包含分数的替代hypothe的合作与调查请求的影响。不幸的是，实验结果缺乏可复制性，这令人尴尬（激励措施有时有效，有时无效;提前通知有时有效，有时无效）。这种状态在科学中很常见，假设可能是真的，但只在有限的情况下;也就是说，一个因素的影响可能会在另一个因素的存在下改变。不幸的是，对调查参与的实证研究往往局限于双变量分析，因此，提出多种影响的理论框架在很大程度上仍然没有得到检验。格罗夫斯和Couper（1998）建立了一个调查参与的概念框架，假设住户在简短的会面中提出调查请求时做出启发式决策。这个框架的一个核心推论是，专家访谈者观察户主的特殊关注点，并使用一种称为”剪裁“的技术来定制他们的评论。通过剪裁，面试官试图提高要求的某些特征的突出性，他们判断这些特征将受到户主的欢迎。剪裁的概念表明
The literature on survey participation contains scores of alternative hypothe about influences on cooperation with survey requests. Unfortunately, there an embarrassing lack of replication of experimental findings (incentives som times work, sometimes don't; advance letters sometimes are effective, sometimes not). Such a status is common in science when the hypotheses may be true, but only for a limited set of circumstances; that is, the effect of one factor may be altered in the presence of another. Unfortunately, the empirical research on survey participation is often limited to bivariate analyses; consequently, theoretical frameworks that propose multiple influences remain largely untested.Groves and Couper (1998) built a conceptual framework of survey participation positing heuristic decision making by householders during the brief encounters in which interviewers present the survey requests. A central deduction from the framework is that expert interviewers observe idiosyncratic concerns of the householder and customize their remarks to those concerns, using a technique labeled" tailoring." By tailoring, interviewers attempt to heighten the salience of some features of the request, those they judge will be favorably received by the householder. The notion of tailoring suggested