Effects of Cultural Inputs on Survival and Growth of Direct Seeded and Naturally Occurring Valley Oak Seedlings on Hardwood Rangeland
Effects of Cultural Inputs on Survival and Growth of Direct Seeded and Naturally Occurring Valley Oak Seedlings on Hardwood Rangeland
复制标题
文化投入对硬木牧场直播和自然生长的山谷橡树幼苗存活和生长的影响
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1997
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
T. Swiecki
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
E. Bernhardt;T. Swiecki
In 1989, acorns were planted at three locations in northern California as part of a project to demonstrate methods for restocking valley oak on hardwood rangeland using sitespecific cultural inputs. Inputs used included protective caging, cattle exclusion, mulching, tillage, and first-year irrigation. In 1995, survival ranged from more than 80 percent in the best treatment/site combination to zero in the worst, and maximum seedling height was 288 cm. Protection from cattle was essential for seedling growth and survival in grazed fields. Seedling survival and growth in caged sites was greater in grazed fields than in adjacent nongrazed fields. Landscape fabric and wood chip mulches applied at planting favored seedling growth and/or survival. Valley oak, Quercus lobata Nee, is frequently included in oak planting projects. This species is relatively easy to propagate, particularly with intensive cultural inputs during the establishment phase. However, intensive inputs may be prohibitively expensive for large-scale plantings intended to restock formerly wooded rangelands. Furthermore, intensive inputs may not be necessary to restock valley oaks in some areas. If large areas of valley oak woodlands are to be restored, land managers will need to identify the set of cultural inputs that will permit them to restock target areas at a minimum of cost. In 1989, we reviewed the literature and evaluated previous plantings to identify factors that affect the establishment of valley oak seedlings (Swiecki and Bernhardt 1991). Using this information, we designed demonstration projects for three locations in northern California. For each project site, we determined what factors were most likely to limit seedling establishment and growth. We then selected restocking methods for each project which represented varying levels of cultural inputs, starting from the minimum deemed necessary to establish seedlings. The combinations of inputs tested in each planting differ because of the different conditions that existed at each location. We previously reported on survival and growth at these projects 9 months (Bernhardt and Swiecki 1991) and 18 months after planting (Swiecki and Bernhardt 1991). In this paper, we report on results from these projects after 6 growing seasons. A fourth demonstration project site, at The Nature Conservancy’s Cosumnes River Preserve, was included in the original study (Bernhardt and Swiecki 1991, Swiecki and Bernhardt 1991). We do not include follow-up data on the Cosumnes project in this paper, because it differs in many respects from the projects at the other three locations.