Reliability and group differences in quantitative cervicothoracic measures among individuals with and without chronic neck pain.
Reliability and group differences in quantitative cervicothoracic measures among individuals with and without chronic neck pain.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1186/1471-2474-13-215
复制
发表时间:
2012-10-31
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Maluf KS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Shahidi B;Johnson CL;Curran-Everett D;Maluf KS
Clinicians frequently rely on subjective categorization of impairments in mobility, strength, and endurance for clinical decision-making; however, these assessments are often unreliable and lack sensitivity to change. The objective of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability, minimum detectable change (MDC), and group differences in quantitative cervicothoracic measures for individuals with and without chronic neck pain (NP). Nineteen individuals with NP and 20 healthy controls participated in this case control study. Two physical therapists performed a 30-minute examination on separate days. A handheld dynamometer, gravity inclinometer, ruler, and stopwatch were used to quantify cervical range of motion (ROM), cervical muscle strength and endurance, and scapulothoracic muscle length and strength, respectively. Intraclass correlation coefficients for inter-rater reliability were significantly greater than zero for most impairment measures, with point estimates ranging from 0.45 to 0.93. The NP group exhibited reduced cervical ROM (P ≤ 0.012) and muscle strength (P ≤ 0.038) in most movement directions, reduced cervical extensor endurance (P = 0.029), and reduced rhomboid and middle trapezius muscle strength (P ≤ 0.049). Results demonstrate the feasibility of obtaining objective cervicothoracic impairment measures with acceptable inter-rater agreement across time. The clinical utility of these measures is supported by evidence of impaired mobility, strength, and endurance among patients with NP, with corresponding MDC values that can help establish benchmarks for clinically significant change.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
--
作者:
Edmondston, Stephen;Bjoernsdottir, Gudny;Allison, Garry
通讯作者:
Allison, Garry
影响因子:
4.3
作者:
Phillips, BA;Lo, SK;Mastaglia, FL
通讯作者:
Mastaglia, FL
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
de Koning, Chantal H. P.;van den Heuvel, Sylvia P.;Hendriks, Erik J. M.
通讯作者:
Hendriks, Erik J. M.
影响因子:
3
作者:
Chiu, TTW;Lo, SK
通讯作者:
Lo, SK
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Domenech, Manuel A.;Sizer, Phil S.;Brismee, Jean-Michel
通讯作者:
Brismee, Jean-Michel