Does Personal Morality Exacerbate or Restrain Retaliation after Being Harmed?
Does Personal Morality Exacerbate or Restrain Retaliation after Being Harmed?
复制标题
个人道德会加剧还是抑制受到伤害后的报复？
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
E. Smith
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
C. Batson;M. Bowers;Emily A. Leonard;E. Smith
为了检验道德责任水平对被伤害反应的影响，80名大学生每人最初拿到10张奖券。一半的参与者随后拿走了10张票中的9张给了另一位参与者，而另一半则没有。在每一种伤害条件下，一半的参与者被引导相信同伴故意拿走了他们的9张票（不管成功与否），而一半的参与者相信同伴并没有故意伤害他们。然后，参与者有机会从这个家伙那里拿票。回应揭示了两个独立的过程，一个是在票被拿走后重建分配正义，另一个是对有意造成的伤害进行报复。道德责任水平对追求分配正义没有影响，但高度的道德责任抑制了对报复性正义的追求。提出了可能的原因。
To examine the effect of level of moral responsibility on response to being harmed, 80 undergraduates each were initially given 10 raffle tickets. Half of the participants subsequently had 9 of their 10 tickets taken away and given to a fellow participant, whereas half did not. In each of these harm-done conditions, half of the participants were led to believe that the fellow participant intentionally took 9 of their tickets (either successfully or not), whereas half believed that the fellow participant did not intend them harm. Participants were then given a chance to take tickets from the fellow. Responses revealed two independent processes, one to reestablish distributive justice after tickets had been taken and the other to retaliate for harm intended. Level of moral responsibility had no effect on pursuit of distributive justice, but high moral responsibility restrained pursuit of retributive (retaliatory) justice. Possible reasons are proposed.