How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental meta-analysis.
How large are gender differences in aggression? A developmental meta-analysis.
复制标题
攻击性方面的性别差异有多大？
DOI：
10.1037/0012-1649.20.4.722
复制
发表时间：
1984
影响因子：
4
通讯作者：
J. Hyde
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Hyde
基于EE Maccoby和CN Jacklin（1974）综述中的研究样本以及1978年至1981年的最新研究样本，对攻击性的性别差异研究进行了荟萃分析，共143项研究。元分析技术也扩展到发展心理学家感兴趣的应用程序。攻击性性别差异的ω-2中位数为。05，d的中位数为。50，这表明，虽然差异似乎相当可靠，但它们并不大。在最近的研究中，性别差异有缩小的趋势。性别差异往往是更大的自然，相关性研究比实验研究。当测量方法是直接观察、投射测试或同伴报告时，性别差异也往往较大，而当使用自我报告或父母或教师报告时，性别差异较小。最后，性别差异的大小与年龄之间存在适度的负相关。对于平均年龄为6岁或更小的研究，中位ω-2为。07、D是58;相比之下，对于大学生的研究，中位数ω-2为。01、D是27.总体结果表明，大约5%的侵略的方差是由于性别差异。(17参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
Conducted a meta-analysis of studies of gender differences in aggression, based on the sample of studies in the EE Maccoby and CN Jacklin (1974) review and a recent sample of studies from 1978 to 1981, for a total of 143 studies. Meta-analysis techniques were also extended to applications of interest to developmental psychologists. The median value of ω–2 for gender differences in aggression was. 05, and the median value of d was. 50, indicating that, although the differences appear fairly reliably, they are not large. There was a trend for gender differences to be smaller in recent studies. Gender differences tended to be larger in naturalistic, correlational studies than in experimental studies. Gender differences also tended to be larger when the method of measurement was direct observation, a projective test, or peer report, and smaller when self-reports or parent or teacher reports were used. Finally, there was a modest negative association between magnitude of gender differences and age. For studies in which mean Ss' age was 6 yrs or less, the median ω–2 was. 07 and d was. 58; in contrast, for studies of college students the median ω–2 was. 01 and d was. 27. Overall results indicate that approximately 5% of the variance in aggression is due to gender differences.(17 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)