Psychopathy, risk taking, and attention:: A differentiated test of the somatic marker hypothesis

Psychopathy, risk taking, and attention:: A differentiated test of the somatic marker hypothesis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0021-843x.113.4.522
复制
发表时间:
2004-11-01
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Schmucker, M
Schmucker, M
中科院分区:
心理学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Lösel, F;Schmucker, M

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

A. R. Damasio(1994)的躯体标记假说将精神病与腹内侧前额叶皮层的缺陷联系起来。使用赌博任务(A。Bechara,A. R.达马西奥湾Damasio,& S.安德森,1994年),作者测试了这一前提和注意力作为调节剂的作用。49名男性囚犯进行了评估与精神病检查表修订版(R。D. Hare,1991),赌博任务,注意力集中和智力的标准化测试。结果显示,没有一般的关系,精神病和赌博任务的表现。然而,注意力得分低的精神病囚犯比注意力集中的囚犯赌博更糟糕。他们也有更多的前科。在非精神病患者中,注意力没有影响。不同的加工策略,精神病和非精神病的个人提出了解释这些发现。
A. R. Damasio's (1994) somatic marker hypothesis relates psychopathy to deficits in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Using the gambling task (A. Bechara, A. R. Damasio, H. Damasio, & S. Anderson, 1994), the authors tested this premise and the role of attention as a moderator. Forty-nine male prison inmates were assessed with the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (R. D. Hare, 1991), the gambling task, and standardized tests on attention-concentration, and intelligence. Results revealed no general relation between psychopathy and gambling task performance. However, psychopathic inmates with low attention scores gambled worse than did the attentive ones. They also had more previous convictions. In nonpsychopathic individuals, attention had no impact. Different processing strategies for psychopathic and nonpsychopathic individuals are proposed to explain these findings.