Plagiarism and related issues in assessments not involving text
Plagiarism and related issues in assessments not involving text
复制标题
不涉及文本的评估中的抄袭及相关问题
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2016
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Mario Minichiello
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Sheard;C. Johnson;A. Carbone;Chris Lawrence;Mario Minichiello
对于散文类试题中的抄袭、串标等问题，人们似乎有一个合理的共识。然而，有许多学科的研究，使用评估项目，而不是基于散文。在计算领域，有计算机程序、数据库、电子表格等;在视觉艺术领域，有图像和其他设计;在音乐领域，有作曲;在数学领域，有证明;在建筑领域，有设计。目前还不清楚，关于剽窃和共谋的共识是否同样适用于这些学科;事实上，这些学科的学者对作者原创性的核心信念是否与散文界的相同，这一点也不清楚。该项目将使用全国性的调查和焦点小组来调查这些学科的学者和学生认为在非基于文本的评估项目中什么构成了学术诚信的破坏，以及他们如何看待这种破坏;以及学者如何阻止这种破坏，发现它们，并处理后果。
There appears to be a reasonably common understanding about plagiarism and collusion in assessment items written in prose text. However, there are many disciplines of study that use assessment items not based in prose. In computing there are computer programs, databases, spreadsheets, and more; in the visual arts there are images and other designs; in music, compositions; in mathematics, proofs; in architecture, designs. It is far from clear that the same sort of consensus about plagiarism and collusion apply across these disciplines; and indeed it is not clear that academics in these disciplines have the same core beliefs about originality of authorship as apply in the world of prose. This project will use nationwide surveys and focus groups to investigate what academics and students in these disciplines think constitute breaches of academic integrity in non-text-based assessment items, and how they regard such breaches; and how academics discourage such breaches, detect them, and deal with the consequences.