Can people remember how they coped? Factors associated with discordance between same-day and retrospective reports
Can people remember how they coped? Factors associated with discordance between same-day and retrospective reports
复制标题
人们能记得他们是如何应对的吗？
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.1050
复制
发表时间：
1999
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
J. Ptacek
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Ronald E Smith;T. Leffingwell;J. Ptacek
使用来自修订的应对方式量表（P.P.Vitaliano，1993）的6个量表的替代形式，作者获得了学生每天的应对得分，因为他们准备了一个要求很高的测试，然后获得了7天的回顾性测量他们的应对。平均而言，只有25%的共享方差之间发现日常和追溯帐户。一个一致的模式，回顾性高估的日常应对发生，并观察到大的个体差异程度的对应关系。在报告考试相关压力水平最高的学生中，日常措施预测的回顾性应对得分差异不到10%。结果表明，回顾性应对报告不能被认为是等同于在更接近事件的措施。
Using alternate forms derived from 6 scales from the Revised Ways of Coping Checklist (P. P. Vitaliano, 1993), the authors obtained daily coping scores from students as they prepared for a demanding test, then obtained a 7-day retrospective measure of their coping. On average, only 25% shared variance was found between the daily and retrospective accounts. A consistent pattern of retrospective overestimation of daily coping occurred, and large individual differences in degree of correspondence were observed. Among students who reported the highest level of exam-related stress, less than 10% of the retrospective coping score variance was predicted by the daily measures. The results indicate that retrospective coping reports cannot be considered equivalent to measures obtained in closer proximity to the event.