EFFECTS OF TALKING ABOUT A STRESSFUL EVENT ON AROUSAL - DOES WHAT WE TALK ABOUT MAKE A DIFFERENCE
EFFECTS OF TALKING ABOUT A STRESSFUL EVENT ON AROUSAL - DOES WHAT WE TALK ABOUT MAKE A DIFFERENCE
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.283
复制
发表时间：
1993-02-01
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
KLECK, RE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
MENDOLIA, M;KLECK, RE
在研究1中，30名男大学生和30名女大学生分别观看了情感中性刺激和应激诱导刺激。然后，学生们谈论他们对压力刺激的情绪反应（情绪条件），压力刺激中的事件序列（事实条件），或中性刺激中的事件序列（分心条件）。在第二次应激刺激时，情绪条件组比事实条件组有更强的自主唤起。在研究2中，48小时后，被试谈论第一次应激刺激与第二次应激刺激。与事实条件组相比，情绪条件组在再次观看刺激时的自主神经唤起水平较低，并且在观看刺激后报告了更多的积极影响。这些结果在认知评价、感知运动和自我表露情绪观点的背景下进行了讨论。
In Study 1, 30 male and 30 female undergraduates viewed an affect-neutral stimulus and a stress-inducing stimulus. Ss then talked about either their emotional reactions to the stressful stimulus (emotion condition), the sequence of events within it (fact condition), or the sequence of events within the neutral stimulus (distraction condition). Emotion-condition Ss were more autonomically aroused during a 2nd exposure to the stressful stimulus than were fact-condition Ss. In Study 2, 48 hr separated Ss' talking about their 1st exposure to the stressful stimulus from their 2nd exposure to it. Emotion-condition Ss had lower levels of autonomic arousal while viewing the stimulus again and reported more positive affect after watching it than did fact-condition Ss. These results are discussed in the context of cognitive appraisal, perceptual-motor, and self-disclosure views of emotion.