Emotional reactivity and the overreport of somatic symptoms: Somatic sensitivity or negative reporting style?
Emotional reactivity and the overreport of somatic symptoms: Somatic sensitivity or negative reporting style?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.09.001
复制
发表时间：
2006-05-01
影响因子：
4.7
通讯作者：
Quigley, Karen
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Aronson, Keith R.;Barrett, Lisa Feldman;Quigley, Karen
目的：本研究旨在探讨情绪反应(ER)在症状报告中的作用，并将躯体化过程概念化为信号检测任务。情绪反应已经被理论上通过躯体敏感性和负面报道风格来影响症状报告。我们评估这两种关于ER角色的相互竞争的理论在信号检测框架内的准确性程度。方法：我们使用了多方法方法，包括使用静态和前瞻性自我报告以及信号检测任务。结果：内质网对躯体化倾向的影响是通过一种负性偏向的报道方式实现的，而不是像躯体感觉放大和症状知觉假说所认为的那样受躯体敏感性的影响。结论：情绪反应性尚未与躯体敏感性的客观测量相关联。在发现这种关联之前，ER很可能通过负面偏见的报告来影响症状报告。(C)2006 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。
Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the role of emotional reactivity (ER) in symptom reporting and conceptualize somatizing processes as a signal detection task. Emotional reactivity has been theorized to influence symptom reporting through somatic sensitivity as well as via a negative reporting style. We assess the degree to which these two competing theories about the role of ER are accurate within the signal detection framework. Methods: We used a multimethod approach that included using both static and prospective self-reports as well as a signal detection task. Results: Results suggest that ER exerts its influence on somatization tendencies via a negatively biased reporting style and is not mediated by somatic sensitivity as suggested by the somatosensory amplification and the symptom perception hypothesis. Conclusion: Emotional reactivity has yet to be associated with objective measures of somatic sensitivity. Until such an association is found, it is likely that ER influences symptom reports via negatively biased reporting. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.