Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design
Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jebo.2011.08.009
复制
发表时间：
2012-01-01
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Kuhn, Michael A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Charness, Gary;Gneezy, Uri;Kuhn, Michael A.
在这篇文章中，我们将探讨围绕主题内和主题间设计的问题。我们描述了经济学和心理学中的实验，这些实验使用这两种设计中的一种（或两者）进行比较，有时会产生相同的结果，有时不会。总体目标是建立一个框架，了解哪些关键问题需要问这样的实验研究，这样的研究的作者可以做些什么来减轻混淆的恐惧，以及哪些情况下特别容易受到两种方法的不同结果。总体而言，我们发现这两种设计都有其优点，设计的选择应根据所研究的问题和研究的实际实施情况进行仔细考虑。(C)2011爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
In this article we explore the issues that surround within-subject and between-subject designs. We describe experiments in economics and in psychology that make comparisons using either of these designs (or both) that sometimes yield the same results and sometimes do not. The overall goal is to establish a framework for understanding which critical questions need to be asked about such experimental studies, what authors of such studies can do to ameliorate fears of confoundedness, and which scenarios are particularly susceptible to divergent results from the two approaches. Overall, we find that both designs have their merits, and the choice of designs should be carefully considered in the context of the question being studied and in terms of the practical implementation of the research study. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.