Case study of institutional and social responses to flooding: reforming for resilience?
Case study of institutional and social responses to flooding: reforming for resilience?
复制标题
机构和社会应对洪水的案例研究：改革以提高复原力？
DOI：
10.1111/j.1753-318x.2010.01087.x
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
A. Cashman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Cashman
直到最近，洪水管理一直强调投资和信任主要依赖于结构坚固性的建筑解决方案。然而，人们对洪水风险管理的态度和政策发生了转变，强调系统方法，其中稳健性和复原力现在发挥着同等作用。负责洪水管理的机构目前正在研究社区和个人的作用、适应洪水和与洪水共存的想法，并将重点放在建设利益攸关方的复原力上，作为洪水风险管理的一项应对战略。本文使用布拉德福德的案例研究，探讨什么可能是弹性的意思，以及布拉德福德市理事会采取的行动如何有助于建立社会弹性方面的洪水风险管理。
Flood management has until recently emphasised investment and trust in constructed solutions that rely mainly on structural robustness. However, there has been a shift in the attitudes and policies towards flood risk management that emphasises a systems approach in which robustness and resilience now have an equal part to play. Agencies that have responsibility for flood management are now looking at the role of communities and individuals, ideas of accommodation and living with floods and placing an emphasis on building resilience among stakeholders as a coping strategy within the management of flood risks. The paper uses the case study of Bradford to explore what might be meant by resilience and how the actions taken by Bradford City Council have contributed towards building social resilience with respect to flood risk management.