A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
A limit on retrieval-induced forgetting.
复制标题
对检索引起的遗忘的限制。
DOI：
10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1314
复制
发表时间：
2001
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Maki,RH
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Butler,KM;Williams,CC;Zacks,RT;Maki,RH
检索记忆集的某些成员会损害后来对语义相关但不相关的成员的回忆（MC Anderson, RA Bjork, & EL Bjork, 1994; MC Anderson & BA Spellman, 1995）。作者调查了这种检索诱导遗忘效应是否会推广到类别提示回忆以外的测试程序中。虽然作者通过类别提示的回忆任务证明了检索诱发遗忘效应，但他们在几个不同的使用特定项目线索的记忆测试中未能显示检索诱发遗忘，包括类别加词干提示的回忆测试、类别加片段提示的回忆测试、片段提示的回忆测试和片段完成任务。（PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2016 APA，版权所有）
Retrieving some members of a memory set impairs later recall of semantically related but not unrelated members (MC Anderson, RA Bjork, & EL Bjork, 1994; MC Anderson & BA Spellman, 1995). The authors investigated whether this retrieval-induced forgetting effect would generalize to testing procedures other than category-cued recall. Although the authors demonstrated a retrieval-induced forgetting effect using a category-cued recall task, they failed to show retrieval-induced forgetting on several different memory tests that used item-specific cues, including a category-plus-stem-cued recall test, a category-plus-fragment-cued recall test, a fragment-cued recall test, and a fragment completion task.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)