Observation of snowfall with a low-power FM-CW K-band radar (Micro Rain Radar)
Observation of snowfall with a low-power FM-CW K-band radar (Micro Rain Radar)
复制标题
使用低功率 FM-CW K 波段雷达(微雨雷达)观测降雪
DOI:
10.1007/s00703-011-0142-z
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
C. Simmer
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kneifel;M. Maahn;G. Peters;C. Simmer
Quantifying snowfall intensity especially under arctic conditions is a challenge because wind and snow drift deteriorate estimates obtained from both ground-based gauges and disdrometers. Ground-based remote sensing with active instruments might be a solution because they can measure well above drifting snow and do not suffer from flow distortions by the instrument. Clear disadvantages are, however, the dependency of e.g. radar returns on snow habit which might lead to similar large uncertainties. Moreover, high sensitivity radars are still far too costly to operate in a network and under harsh conditions. In this paper we compare returns from a low-cost, low-power vertically pointing FM-CW radar (Micro Rain Radar, MRR) operating at 24.1 GHz with returns from a 35.5 GHz cloud radar (MIRA36) for dry snowfall during a 6-month observation period at an Alpine station (Environmental Research Station Schneefernerhaus, UFS) at 2,650 m height above sea level. The goal was to quantify the potential and limitations of the MRR in relation to what is achievable by a cloud radar. The operational MRR procedures to derive standard radar variables like effective reflectivity factor (Ze) or the mean Doppler velocity (W) had to be modified for snowfall since the MRR was originally designed for rain observations. Since the radar returns from snowfall are weaker than from comparable rainfall, the behavior of the MRR close to its detection threshold has been analyzed and a method is proposed to quantify the noise level of the MRR based on clear sky observations. By converting the resulting MRR-Zeinto 35.5 GHz equivalentZevalues, a remaining difference below 1 dBz with slightly higher values close to the noise threshold could be obtained. Due to the much higher sensitivity of MIRA36, the transition of the MRR from the true signal to noise can be observed, which agrees well with the independent clear sky noise estimate. The mean Doppler velocity differences between both radars are below 0.3 ms−1. The distribution ofZevalues from MIRA36 are finally used to estimate the uncertainty of retrieved snowfall and snow accumulation with the MRR. At UFS low snowfall rates missed by the MRR are negligible when comparing snow accumulation, which were mainly caused by intensities between 0.1 and 0.8 mm h−1. The MRR overestimates the total snow accumulation by about 7%. This error is much smaller than the error caused by uncertainZe–snowfall rate relations, which would affect the MIRA36 estimated to a similar degree.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1029/2010jd013856
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Kneifel;U. Löhnert;A. Battaglia;S. Crewell;D. Siebler
通讯作者:
D. Siebler
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1990
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
R. Braham
通讯作者:
R. Braham
DOI:
10.12968/sece.2008.6.1225
发表时间:
2008-06
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
Carrie Dunn
通讯作者:
Carrie Dunn
DOI:
10.1029/2010jd013856/abstract
发表时间:
2010
期刊:
Scopus
影响因子:
--
作者:
S. Kneifel;U. Löhnert;S. Crewell;A. Battaglia;D. Siebler
通讯作者:
D. Siebler
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
E. Brandes;K. Ikeda;G. Thompson;M. Schönhuber
通讯作者:
M. Schönhuber